Red Robin, Clucks & Fries, Buffalo Style
Red Robin, Clucks & Fries, Buffalo Style by Red Robin is listed in the Entrees category. That is 66% less sugar than the average product in this category. Its Nutri-Score is E. It comes in a 1 serving(s) pack.
Nutrient levels per 100 g
Levels use UK front-of-pack reference thresholds.
Nutrition facts
Serving size: 100g
| Nutrient | Per 100 g | Per serving | % DV* | Category avg |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Saturated fat | 28 g | 28 g | 140% | 9.8 +185% |
| Total sugars | 3 g | 3 g | 8.8 −66% | |
| Dietary fiber | 18 g | 18 g | 64% | 3 +502% |
| Protein | 48 g | 48 g | 96% | 28.4 +69% |
| Salt | 10.2 g | 10.2 g | 3.2 +222% |
*% Daily Value for a serving, based on a 2,000-calorie diet (FDA reference values). Category average across 3741 Entrees products on Foodmetria.
Compared with other entrees
Bar shows the share of products in this category that contain less of the nutrient.
Ingredients
undefined
Product details
- Quantity
- 1 serving(s)
- Serving size
- 100g
- Sold in
- United States
- Barcode
- 865234445444857891
Prices reported by shoppers
Loading prices…
Frequently asked questions
How much sugar is in Red Robin, Clucks & Fries, Buffalo Style?
Red Robin, Clucks & Fries, Buffalo Style has 3 g of sugars per 100 g, which is considered low by UK front-of-pack guidelines.
Is Red Robin, Clucks & Fries, Buffalo Style healthy?
It has a Nutri-Score of E (A is best, E is worst). Scores describe nutritional quality and processing, not suitability for your individual diet.
Source: Open Food Facts (ODbL). Last updated February 21, 2025. Spotted a mistake? Edit this product on Open Food Facts. Not medical advice — always check the package label.
Reviews
Healthier alternatives
Best in category →Same category, meaningfully better on at least one measure and no worse on the others. Each card shows what improves.
More entrees
View all →
d NOVA 4 
d NOVA 4 More from Red Robin
View all →
c NOVA 4