Outback Steakhouse, Chicken Fingers
Outback Steakhouse, Chicken Fingers by Outback Steakhouse provides 477 kcal per 100 g, with 1 g of sugars and 26 g of protein. That is 89% less sugar than the average product in this category. Its Nutri-Score is E. It is listed in the Entrees category and comes in a 1 serving(s) pack.
Nutrient levels per 100 g
Levels use UK front-of-pack reference thresholds.
Nutrition facts
Serving size: 100g
| Nutrient | Per 100 g | Per serving | % DV* | Category avg |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 477 kcal | 477 kcal | 390 +22% | |
| Total fat | 29 g | 29 g | 37% | 26.4 +10% |
| Saturated fat | 13 g | 13 g | 65% | 9.8 +33% |
| Carbohydrates | 28 g | 28 g | 10% | 29.8 −6% |
| Total sugars | 1 g | 1 g | 8.8 −89% | |
| Dietary fiber | 2 g | 2 g | 7% | 3 −33% |
| Protein | 26 g | 26 g | 52% | 28.4 −8% |
| Salt | 2 g | 2 g | 3.2 −37% |
*% Daily Value for a serving, based on a 2,000-calorie diet (FDA reference values). Category average across 3741 Entrees products on Foodmetria.
Compared with other entrees
Bar shows the share of products in this category that contain less of the nutrient.
Ingredients
undefined
Product details
- Quantity
- 1 serving(s)
- Serving size
- 100g
- Sold in
- United States
- Barcode
- 935325604114870195
Prices reported by shoppers
Loading prices…
Frequently asked questions
How many calories are in Outback Steakhouse, Chicken Fingers?
Outback Steakhouse, Chicken Fingers contains 477 kcal per 100 g and about 477 kcal per serving (100g).
How much sugar is in Outback Steakhouse, Chicken Fingers?
Outback Steakhouse, Chicken Fingers has 1 g of sugars per 100 g, which is considered low by UK front-of-pack guidelines.
Is Outback Steakhouse, Chicken Fingers healthy?
It has a Nutri-Score of E (A is best, E is worst). Scores describe nutritional quality and processing, not suitability for your individual diet.
Source: Open Food Facts (ODbL). Last updated February 20, 2025. Spotted a mistake? Edit this product on Open Food Facts. Not medical advice — always check the package label.
Reviews
Healthier alternatives
Best in category →Same category, meaningfully better on at least one measure and no worse on the others. Each card shows what improves.
More entrees
View all →
d NOVA 4 
d NOVA 4