Nutrition report ready

Old fashioned jelly

Calories, Nutri-Score, processing level, additives, ingredients and shopper prices.

Nutri-Score D

View details

Old fashioned jelly

9 oz in Sweet spreads Barcode 0049646123209
Poor nutritional quality

Old fashioned jelly provides 300 kcal per 100 g, with 75 g of sugars and 0 g of protein. That is 78% more sugar than the average product in this category. Its Nutri-Score is D. It is listed in the Sweet spreads category and comes in a 9 oz pack.

Nutrient levels per 100 g

Fat
0 g · Low
Saturated fat
0 g · Low
Sugars
75 g · High
Salt
0 g · Low

Levels use UK front-of-pack reference thresholds.

Nutrition facts

Nutrient Per 100 g Category avg
Calories 300 kcal 387 −23%
Total fat 0 g 19 −100%
Saturated fat 0 g 5.1 −100%
Carbohydrates 80 g 48.4 +65%
Total sugars 75 g 42.2 +78%
Dietary fiber 0 g 3.3 −100%
Protein 0 g 5.2 −100%
Salt 0 g 0.3 −100%

Category average across 717 Sweet spreads products on Foodmetria.

Compared with other sweet spreads

Calories lower 42%
Sugars higher 1%
Salt lower 1%
Saturated fat lower 1%
Protein top 100%
Fiber top 100%

Bar shows the share of products in this category that contain less of the nutrient.

Product details

Quantity
9 oz
Sold in
United States
Barcode
0049646123209

Prices reported by shoppers

Loading prices…

Frequently asked questions

How many calories are in Old fashioned jelly?

Old fashioned jelly contains 300 kcal per 100 g.

How much sugar is in Old fashioned jelly?

Old fashioned jelly has 75 g of sugars per 100 g, which is considered high by UK front-of-pack guidelines.

Is Old fashioned jelly healthy?

It has a Nutri-Score of D (A is best, E is worst). Scores describe nutritional quality and processing, not suitability for your individual diet.

Source: Open Food Facts (ODbL). Last updated February 8, 2022. Spotted a mistake? Edit this product on Open Food Facts. Not medical advice — always check the package label.

Reviews

No reviews yet. Tried Old fashioned jelly? Be the first to share how it tastes.

Write a review

Your rating

Reviews are moderated. See our Privacy Policy.

Compare & rankings

Healthier alternatives

Best in category →

Same category, meaningfully better on at least one measure and no worse on the others. Each card shows what improves.

More sweet spreads

View all →