Nectar de peche jaune PATRICK FONT, bouteille de
Nectar de peche jaune PATRICK FONT, bouteille de by Emile Vergeois provides 50 kcal per 100 g, with 10 g of sugars and 0 g of protein. That is 30% less sugar than the average product in this category. Its Nutri-Score is E and it is classified as NOVA 3 (processed food). It is listed in the Sweetened beverages category.
Nutrient levels per 100 g
Levels use UK front-of-pack reference thresholds.
Nutrition facts
| Nutrient | Per 100 g | Category avg |
|---|---|---|
| Calories | 50 kcal | 69 −27% |
| Total fat | 0 g | 0.5 −100% |
| Saturated fat | 0 g | 0.3 −100% |
| Carbohydrates | 12 g | 15.3 −21% |
| Total sugars | 10 g | 14.3 −30% |
| Added sugars | 2.5 g | 14.2 −82% |
| Dietary fiber | 0 g | 0.5 −100% |
| Protein | 0 g | 0.7 −100% |
| Salt | 0 g | 0.1 −100% |
*% Daily Value for 100 g, based on a 2,000-calorie diet (FDA reference values). Category average across 11653 Sweetened beverages products on Foodmetria.
Compared with other sweetened beverages
Bar shows the share of products in this category that contain less of the nutrient.
Ingredients
Eau, Pulpe (45%), Sucre. Acidifiant : Acide citrique. Antioxydant : Acide ascorbique.
Additives 2
Overexposure risk is based on EFSA evaluations as recorded by Open Food Facts.
Product details
- Sold in
- France
- Barcode
- 3760131160109
Prices reported by shoppers
Loading prices…
Frequently asked questions
How many calories are in Nectar de peche jaune PATRICK FONT, bouteille de?
Nectar de peche jaune PATRICK FONT, bouteille de contains 50 kcal per 100 g.
How much sugar is in Nectar de peche jaune PATRICK FONT, bouteille de?
Nectar de peche jaune PATRICK FONT, bouteille de has 10 g of sugars per 100 g, which is considered moderate by UK front-of-pack guidelines.
Is Nectar de peche jaune PATRICK FONT, bouteille de healthy?
It has a Nutri-Score of E (A is best, E is worst); it is in NOVA group 3 — processed food. Scores describe nutritional quality and processing, not suitability for your individual diet.
Source: Open Food Facts (ODbL). Last updated March 21, 2026. Spotted a mistake? Edit this product on Open Food Facts. Not medical advice — always check the package label.
Reviews
Compare & rankings
Healthier alternatives
Best in category →Same category, meaningfully better on at least one measure and no worse on the others. Each card shows what improves.
More sweetened beverages
View all →
e NOVA 4 
c NOVA 4 
c NOVA 4 
e NOVA 4 
d NOVA 4 
e NOVA 4 More from Emile Vergeois
View all →
e NOVA 3 
c NOVA 1 
e 
c 
c 
c NOVA 1