Maud borup, cotton candy, cherry
Maud borup, cotton candy, cherry by Maud Borup provides 381 kcal per 100 g, with 100 g of sugars and 0 g of protein. That is 83% more sugar than the average product in this category. Its Nutri-Score is E and it is classified as NOVA 4 (ultra-processed food). It is listed in the Confectioneries category.
Nutrient levels per 100 g
Levels use UK front-of-pack reference thresholds.
Nutrition facts
Serving size: 1 1/2 onz (42 g)
| Nutrient | Per 100 g | Per serving | % DV* | Category avg |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 381 kcal | 160 kcal | 409 −7% | |
| Total fat | 0 g | 0 g | 0% | 9.5 −100% |
| Carbohydrates | 100 g | 42 g | 15% | 74.3 +35% |
| Total sugars | 100 g | 42 g | 54.6 +83% | |
| Protein | 0 g | 0 g | 0% | 3.3 −100% |
| Salt | 0 g | 0 g | 0.3 −100% |
*% Daily Value for a serving, based on a 2,000-calorie diet (FDA reference values). Category average across 19312 Confectioneries products on Foodmetria.
Serving size from the US product label in USDA FoodData Central, label data from July 2021. Other values: Open Food Facts.
Compared with other confectioneries
Bar shows the share of products in this category that contain less of the nutrient.
Ingredients
Sugar, fd&c red 40, artificial flavor.
Additives 1
Overexposure risk is based on EFSA evaluations as recorded by Open Food Facts.
Product details
- Serving size
- 1 1/2 onz (42 g)
- Sold in
- United States
- Barcode
- 0819893023726
Prices reported by shoppers
Loading prices…
Frequently asked questions
How many calories are in Maud borup, cotton candy, cherry?
Maud borup, cotton candy, cherry contains 381 kcal per 100 g and about 160 kcal per serving (1 1/2 onz (42 g)).
How much sugar is in Maud borup, cotton candy, cherry?
Maud borup, cotton candy, cherry has 100 g of sugars per 100 g, which is considered high by UK front-of-pack guidelines.
Is Maud borup, cotton candy, cherry healthy?
It has a Nutri-Score of E (A is best, E is worst); it is in NOVA group 4 — ultra-processed food. Scores describe nutritional quality and processing, not suitability for your individual diet.
Source: Open Food Facts (ODbL). Last updated April 22, 2020. Spotted a mistake? Edit this product on Open Food Facts. Not medical advice — always check the package label.
Reviews
Compare & rankings
Healthier alternatives
Best in category →Same category, meaningfully better on at least one measure and no worse on the others. Each card shows what improves.
a NOVA 4 
a 
b NOVA 4 
b NOVA 4 More confectioneries
View all →
e NOVA 4 
d NOVA 3 
e NOVA 4 
e NOVA 4 
b NOVA 4 
e NOVA 4 More from Maud Borup
View all →
NOVA 4 
e NOVA 4 
e NOVA 4 
d NOVA 4