Kylling Gården Kyllingfilet skivet

by Prior 210g in Chickens Barcode 7039610007911
Very good nutritional quality
Green-Score
e
Environmental impact estimate

Kylling Gården Kyllingfilet skivet by Prior provides 111 kcal per 100 g, with 0 g of sugars and 23 g of protein. That is 100% less sugar than the average product in this category. Its Nutri-Score is A. It is listed in the Chickens category and comes in a 210g pack.

Nutrient levels per 100 g

Fat
2.1 g · Low
Saturated fat
0.6 g · Low
Sugars
0 g · Low
Salt
0.2 g · Low

Levels use UK front-of-pack reference thresholds.

Nutrition facts

Nutrient Per 100 g Category avg
Calories 111 kcal 162 −32%
Total fat 2.1 g 7.6 −72%
Saturated fat 0.6 g 2 −69%
Carbohydrates 0 g 5 −100%
Total sugars 0 g 1 −100%
Added sugars 0 g 0.9 −100%
Protein 23 g 18.4 +25%
Salt 0.2 g 1.3 −85%

Category average across 3721 Chickens products on Foodmetria.

Compared with other chickens

Calories lower 22%
Sugars lower 1%
Salt lower 19%
Saturated fat lower 20%
Protein top 18%

Bar shows the share of products in this category that contain less of the nutrient.

Ingredients

Kyllingfilet.

Product details

Quantity
210g
Labels & certifications
Green DotKeyhole
Sold in
Norway
Barcode
7039610007911

Prices reported by shoppers

Loading prices…

Frequently asked questions

How many calories are in Kylling Gården Kyllingfilet skivet?

Kylling Gården Kyllingfilet skivet contains 111 kcal per 100 g.

How much sugar is in Kylling Gården Kyllingfilet skivet?

Kylling Gården Kyllingfilet skivet has 0 g of sugars per 100 g, which is considered low by UK front-of-pack guidelines.

Is Kylling Gården Kyllingfilet skivet healthy?

It has a Nutri-Score of A (A is best, E is worst). Scores describe nutritional quality and processing, not suitability for your individual diet.

Source: Open Food Facts (ODbL). Last updated April 29, 2026. Spotted a mistake? Edit this product on Open Food Facts. Not medical advice — always check the package label.

Reviews

No reviews yet. Tried Kylling Gården Kyllingfilet skivet? Be the first to share how it tastes.

Write a review

Your rating

Reviews are moderated. See our Privacy Policy.

Compare & rankings

Healthier alternatives

Best in category →

Same category, meaningfully better on at least one measure and no worse on the others. Each card shows what improves.

More chickens

View all →

More from Prior

View all →