View full-size photo · Photo: Open Food Facts contributors, CC BY-SA
Kyckling Med Cashewnötter & Grönsaker
Kyckling Med Cashewnötter & Grönsaker by Kin Food provides 150 kcal per 100 g, with 3 g of sugars and 6.6 g of protein. That is 186% more sugar than the average product in this category. Its Nutri-Score is B. It is listed in the Chickens category.
Nutrient levels per 100 g
Levels use UK front-of-pack reference thresholds.
Nutrition facts
Serving size: 500 g
| Nutrient | Per 100 g | Per serving | % DV* | Category avg |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 150 kcal | 748 kcal | 162 −8% | |
| Total fat | 5.9 g | 29.4 g | 38% | 7.6 −22% |
| Saturated fat | 1.1 g | 5.5 g | 28% | 2 −44% |
| Carbohydrates | 16.9 g | 84.7 g | 31% | 5 +240% |
| Total sugars | 3 g | 14.9 g | 1 +186% | |
| Dietary fiber | 0.2 g | 0.9 g | 3% | 0.8 −77% |
| Protein | 6.6 g | 32.9 g | 66% | 18.4 −64% |
| Salt | 0.3 g | 1.3 g | 1.3 −81% |
*% Daily Value for a serving, based on a 2,000-calorie diet (FDA reference values). Category average across 3721 Chickens products on Foodmetria.
Compared with other chickens
Bar shows the share of products in this category that contain less of the nutrient.
Product details
- Serving size
- 500 g
- Sold in
- Sweden
- Barcode
- 7350126470014
Prices reported by shoppers
Loading prices…
Frequently asked questions
How many calories are in Kyckling Med Cashewnötter & Grönsaker?
Kyckling Med Cashewnötter & Grönsaker contains 150 kcal per 100 g and about 748 kcal per serving (500 g).
How much sugar is in Kyckling Med Cashewnötter & Grönsaker?
Kyckling Med Cashewnötter & Grönsaker has 3 g of sugars per 100 g, which is considered low by UK front-of-pack guidelines.
Is Kyckling Med Cashewnötter & Grönsaker healthy?
It has a Nutri-Score of B (A is best, E is worst). Scores describe nutritional quality and processing, not suitability for your individual diet.
Source: Open Food Facts (ODbL). Last updated July 2, 2026. Spotted a mistake? Edit this product on Open Food Facts. Not medical advice — always check the package label.
Reviews
Compare & rankings
Healthier alternatives
Best in category →Same category, meaningfully better on at least one measure and no worse on the others. Each card shows what improves.
a 
a 
a 
a More chickens
View all →
b NOVA 4 
d NOVA 4 
b NOVA 4 
d NOVA 4 
c NOVA 4 
a NOVA 4