Nutrition report ready
Hustenbonbons mit Eukalyptus "Atemfrei"
Nutri-Score B NOVA 4
View details
View full-size photo · Photo: Open Food Facts contributors, CC BY-SA
Hustenbonbons mit Eukalyptus "Atemfrei"
Hustenbonbons mit Eukalyptus "Atemfrei" by Wick provides 388 kcal per 100 g, with 0 g of sugars and 0 g of protein. That is 100% less sugar than the average product in this category. Its Nutri-Score is B and it is classified as NOVA 4 (ultra-processed food). It is listed in the Candies category and comes in a 72g pack.
Nutrient levels per 100 g
Levels use UK front-of-pack reference thresholds.
Nutrition facts
| Nutrient | Per 100 g | Category avg |
|---|---|---|
| Calories | 388 kcal | 364 +7% |
| Total fat | 0 g | 3.3 −100% |
| Saturated fat | 0 g | 1.9 −100% |
| Carbohydrates | 97 g | 81.5 +19% |
| Total sugars | 0 g | 54.5 −100% |
| Added sugars | 0 g | 49.3 −100% |
| Dietary fiber | 0 g | 2.7 −100% |
| Protein | 0 g | 2.1 −100% |
| Salt | 0 g | 0.3 −100% |
*% Daily Value for 100 g, based on a 2,000-calorie diet (FDA reference values). Category average across 11642 Candies products on Foodmetria.
Compared with other candies
Bar shows the share of products in this category that contain less of the nutrient.
Ingredients
Süßungsmittel (Isomalt, Xylit, Acesulfam K), Menthol (0,3 %), Eukalyptusöl (0,15 %)
Additives 3
Overexposure risk is based on EFSA evaluations as recorded by Open Food Facts.
Product details
- Quantity
- 72g
- Sold in
- Germany
- Barcode
- 4030300022057
Prices reported by shoppers
Loading prices…
Frequently asked questions
How many calories are in Hustenbonbons mit Eukalyptus "Atemfrei"?
Hustenbonbons mit Eukalyptus "Atemfrei" contains 388 kcal per 100 g.
How much sugar is in Hustenbonbons mit Eukalyptus "Atemfrei"?
Hustenbonbons mit Eukalyptus "Atemfrei" has 0 g of sugars per 100 g, which is considered low by UK front-of-pack guidelines.
Is Hustenbonbons mit Eukalyptus "Atemfrei" healthy?
It has a Nutri-Score of B (A is best, E is worst); it is in NOVA group 4 — ultra-processed food. Scores describe nutritional quality and processing, not suitability for your individual diet.
Source: Open Food Facts (ODbL). Last updated March 25, 2026. Spotted a mistake? Edit this product on Open Food Facts. Not medical advice — always check the package label.
Reviews
Compare & rankings
Healthier alternatives
Best in category →Same category, meaningfully better on at least one measure and no worse on the others. Each card shows what improves.
More candies
View all →
e NOVA 4 
b NOVA 4 
e NOVA 4 
c NOVA 4 
b NOVA 4 
e NOVA 4 More from Wick
View all →
b NOVA 4 
b NOVA 4 
b NOVA 4 
b NOVA 4 
b