View full-size photo · Photo: Open Food Facts contributors, CC BY-SA
Hustenbonbons mit Eukalyptus
Hustenbonbons mit Eukalyptus by Wick provides 384 kcal per 100 g, with 0.5 g of sugars and 0 g of protein. That is 99% less sugar than the average product in this category. Its Nutri-Score is B. It is listed in the Candies category and comes in a 72g pack.
Nutrient levels per 100 g
Levels use UK front-of-pack reference thresholds.
Nutrition facts
Serving size: 5 bonbons (24 g)
| Nutrient | Per 100 g | Per serving | % DV* | Category avg |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 384 kcal | 92 kcal | 364 +6% | |
| Total fat | 0 g | 0 g | 0% | 3.3 −100% |
| Saturated fat | 0 g | 0 g | 0% | 1.9 −100% |
| Carbohydrates | 96 g | 23 g | 8% | 81.6 +18% |
| Total sugars | 0.5 g | 0.1 g | 54.5 −99% | |
| Dietary fiber | 0 g | 0 g | 0% | 2.7 −100% |
| Protein | 0 g | 0 g | 0% | 2.1 −100% |
| Salt | 0 g | 0 g | 0.3 −97% |
*% Daily Value for a serving, based on a 2,000-calorie diet (FDA reference values). Category average across 11614 Candies products on Foodmetria.
Compared with other candies
Bar shows the share of products in this category that contain less of the nutrient.
Product details
- Quantity
- 72g
- Serving size
- 5 bonbons (24 g)
- Sold in
- Germany
- Barcode
- 4030300002523
Prices reported by shoppers
Loading prices…
Frequently asked questions
How many calories are in Hustenbonbons mit Eukalyptus?
Hustenbonbons mit Eukalyptus contains 384 kcal per 100 g and about 92 kcal per serving (5 bonbons (24 g)).
How much sugar is in Hustenbonbons mit Eukalyptus?
Hustenbonbons mit Eukalyptus has 0.5 g of sugars per 100 g, which is considered low by UK front-of-pack guidelines.
Is Hustenbonbons mit Eukalyptus healthy?
It has a Nutri-Score of B (A is best, E is worst). Scores describe nutritional quality and processing, not suitability for your individual diet.
Source: Open Food Facts (ODbL). Last updated March 26, 2026. Spotted a mistake? Edit this product on Open Food Facts. Not medical advice — always check the package label.
Reviews
Compare & rankings
Healthier alternatives
Best in category →Same category, meaningfully better on at least one measure and no worse on the others. Each card shows what improves.
More candies
View all →
e NOVA 4 
b NOVA 4 
e NOVA 4 
c NOVA 4 
b NOVA 4 
e NOVA 4 More from Wick
View all →
b NOVA 4 
b NOVA 4 
b NOVA 4 
b NOVA 4 
b NOVA 4