View full-size photo · Photo: Open Food Facts contributors, CC BY-SA
Haferflocken
Haferflocken by Alnativ provides 372 kcal per 100 g, with 0.8 g of sugars and 13 g of protein. That is 89% less sugar than the average product in this category. Its Nutri-Score is A and it is classified as NOVA 1 (unprocessed or minimally processed). It is listed in the Pflanzliche lebensmittel und getränke category and comes in a 450g pack.
Nutrient levels per 100 g
Levels use UK front-of-pack reference thresholds.
Nutrition facts
| Nutrient | Per 100 g | Category avg |
|---|---|---|
| Calories | 372 kcal | 240 +55% |
| Total fat | 6.7 g | 9.8 −32% |
| Saturated fat | 1.1 g | 2.3 −52% |
| Carbohydrates | 60 g | 29.9 +101% |
| Total sugars | 0.8 g | 7.1 −89% |
| Added sugars | 0 g | 2.5 −100% |
| Dietary fiber | 9.7 g | 5.2 +86% |
| Protein | 13 g | 6.1 +114% |
| Salt | 0 g | 1 −99% |
*% Daily Value for 100 g, based on a 2,000-calorie diet (FDA reference values). Category average across 984 Pflanzliche lebensmittel und getränke products on Foodmetria.
Compared with other pflanzliche lebensmittel und getränke
Bar shows the share of products in this category that contain less of the nutrient.
Ingredients
Glutenfreie Haferflocken
Product details
- Quantity
- 450g
- Labels & certifications
- No glutenOrganicVegetarianEU OrganicVeganEg öko verordnungDE-ÖKO-001EU AgricultureThe Vegan Society
- Sold in
- Germany
- Barcode
- 42305156
Prices reported by shoppers
Loading prices…
Frequently asked questions
How many calories are in Haferflocken?
Haferflocken contains 372 kcal per 100 g.
How much sugar is in Haferflocken?
Haferflocken has 0.8 g of sugars per 100 g, which is considered low by UK front-of-pack guidelines.
Is Haferflocken healthy?
It has a Nutri-Score of A (A is best, E is worst); it is in NOVA group 1 — unprocessed or minimally processed. Scores describe nutritional quality and processing, not suitability for your individual diet.
Is Haferflocken vegan?
Based on its ingredient list, it appears to be vegan. Always check the package label.
Source: Open Food Facts (ODbL). Last updated March 25, 2026. Spotted a mistake? Edit this product on Open Food Facts. Not medical advice — always check the package label.
Reviews
Compare & rankings
Healthier alternatives
Best in category →Same category, meaningfully better on at least one measure and no worse on the others. Each card shows what improves.
More pflanzliche lebensmittel und getränke
View all →
b NOVA 4 
c NOVA 4 
d NOVA 3 
d NOVA 4 
NOVA 4 
d NOVA 3 