Eriks Rhode Island

by Erik Lallerstedt in Salad dressings Barcode 7350042721276
Average nutritional quality
Green-Score
d
Environmental impact estimate

Eriks Rhode Island by Erik Lallerstedt provides 500 kcal per 100 g, with 1.4 g of sugars and 1 g of protein. That is 82% less sugar than the average product in this category. Its Nutri-Score is C. It is listed in the Salad dressings category.

Nutrient levels per 100 g

Fat
54 g · High
Saturated fat
4.2 g · Moderate
Sugars
1.4 g · Low
Salt
0 g · Low

Levels use UK front-of-pack reference thresholds.

Nutrition facts

Nutrient Per 100 g Category avg
Calories 500 kcal 295 +69%
Total fat 54 g 27.5 +96%
Saturated fat 4.2 g 3.5 +19%
Carbohydrates 4.6 g 10.8 −57%
Total sugars 1.4 g 7.9 −82%
Protein 1 g 1.2 −18%
Salt 0 g 2.1 −100%

Category average across 1817 Salad dressings products on Foodmetria.

Compared with other salad dressings

Calories higher 9%
Sugars lower 18%
Salt lower 1%
Saturated fat higher 31%
Protein top 39%

Bar shows the share of products in this category that contain less of the nutrient.

Product details

Sold in
Sweden
Barcode
7350042721276

Prices reported by shoppers

Loading prices…

Frequently asked questions

How many calories are in Eriks Rhode Island?

Eriks Rhode Island contains 500 kcal per 100 g.

How much sugar is in Eriks Rhode Island?

Eriks Rhode Island has 1.4 g of sugars per 100 g, which is considered low by UK front-of-pack guidelines.

Is Eriks Rhode Island healthy?

It has a Nutri-Score of C (A is best, E is worst). Scores describe nutritional quality and processing, not suitability for your individual diet.

Source: Open Food Facts (ODbL). Last updated September 8, 2026. Spotted a mistake? Edit this product on Open Food Facts. Not medical advice — always check the package label.

Reviews

No reviews yet. Tried Eriks Rhode Island? Be the first to share how it tastes.

Write a review

Your rating

Reviews are moderated. See our Privacy Policy.

Compare & rankings

Healthier alternatives

Best in category →

Same category, meaningfully better on at least one measure and no worse on the others. Each card shows what improves.

More salad dressings

View all →