Nutrition report ready

Equo Land positive Rad

Calories, Nutri-Score, processing level, additives, ingredients and shopper prices.

Nutri-Score E

View details

Equo Land positive Rad

in Sweet snacks Barcode 8056772452310
Bad nutritional quality

Equo Land positive Rad provides 586 kcal per 100 g, with 25 g of sugars and 8 g of protein. That is 33% less sugar than the average product in this category. Its Nutri-Score is E. It is listed in the Sweet snacks category.

Nutrient levels per 100 g

Fat
47.6 g · High
Saturated fat
25.8 g · High
Sugars
25 g · High
Salt
0.1 g · Low

Levels use UK front-of-pack reference thresholds.

Nutrition facts

Nutrient Per 100 g Category avg
Calories 586 kcal 427 +37%
Total fat 47.6 g 18.4 +159%
Saturated fat 25.8 g 8.6 +201%
Carbohydrates 25.7 g 58.4 −56%
Total sugars 25 g 37.2 −33%
Dietary fiber 15.7 g 4.5 +252%
Protein 8 g 6.1 +31%
Salt 0.1 g 0.6 −83%

Category average across 2983 Sweet snacks products on Foodmetria.

Compared with other sweet snacks

Calories higher 3%
Sugars lower 26%
Salt lower 19%
Saturated fat higher 2%
Protein top 19%
Fiber top 4%

Bar shows the share of products in this category that contain less of the nutrient.

Product details

Sold in
Italy
Barcode
8056772452310

Prices reported by shoppers

Loading prices…

Frequently asked questions

How many calories are in Equo Land positive Rad?

Equo Land positive Rad contains 586 kcal per 100 g.

How much sugar is in Equo Land positive Rad?

Equo Land positive Rad has 25 g of sugars per 100 g, which is considered high by UK front-of-pack guidelines.

Is Equo Land positive Rad healthy?

It has a Nutri-Score of E (A is best, E is worst). Scores describe nutritional quality and processing, not suitability for your individual diet.

Source: Open Food Facts (ODbL). Last updated March 30, 2026. Spotted a mistake? Edit this product on Open Food Facts. Not medical advice — always check the package label.

Reviews

No reviews yet. Tried Equo Land positive Rad? Be the first to share how it tastes.

Write a review

Your rating

Reviews are moderated. See our Privacy Policy.

Compare & rankings

Healthier alternatives

Best in category →

Same category, meaningfully better on at least one measure and no worse on the others. Each card shows what improves.

More sweet snacks

View all →