Ch. de Pena Côtes Roussillon Vill.
Ch. de Pena Côtes Roussillon Vill. provides 5 kcal per 100 g, with 0.3 g of sugars and 0.1 g of protein. That is 88% less sugar than the average product in this category. It is classified as NOVA 3 (processed food). It is listed in the Red wines category and comes in a 75cl pack. Contains: sulphur dioxide and sulphites.
Nutrient levels per 100 g
Levels use UK front-of-pack reference thresholds.
Nutrition facts
| Nutrient | Per 100 g | Category avg |
|---|---|---|
| Calories | 5 kcal | 37 −87% |
| Total fat | 0.1 g | 1.2 −91% |
| Saturated fat | 0.1 g | 0.3 −65% |
| Carbohydrates | 1 g | 4.8 −79% |
| Total sugars | 0.3 g | 2.5 −88% |
| Protein | 0.1 g | 0.8 −88% |
| Salt | 0 g | 0.2 −94% |
*% Daily Value for 100 g, based on a 2,000-calorie diet (FDA reference values). Category average across 700 Red wines products on Foodmetria.
Compared with other red wines
Bar shows the share of products in this category that contain less of the nutrient.
Ingredients
Contains SULPHITES
- Allergens
- Sulphur dioxide and sulphites
Product details
- Quantity
- 75cl
- Sold in
- Belgium
- Barcode
- 3500611117717
Prices reported by shoppers
Loading prices…
Frequently asked questions
How many calories are in Ch. de Pena Côtes Roussillon Vill.?
Ch. de Pena Côtes Roussillon Vill. contains 5 kcal per 100 g.
How much sugar is in Ch. de Pena Côtes Roussillon Vill.?
Ch. de Pena Côtes Roussillon Vill. has 0.3 g of sugars per 100 g, which is considered low by UK front-of-pack guidelines.
Is Ch. de Pena Côtes Roussillon Vill. healthy?
It is in NOVA group 3 — processed food. Scores describe nutritional quality and processing, not suitability for your individual diet.
What allergens does Ch. de Pena Côtes Roussillon Vill. contain?
According to the label data it contains: Sulphur dioxide and sulphites. Recipes change — always check the package label.
Source: Open Food Facts (ODbL). Last updated August 1, 2026. Spotted a mistake? Edit this product on Open Food Facts. Not medical advice — always check the package label.
Reviews
Compare & rankings
Healthier alternatives
Best in category →Same category, meaningfully better on at least one measure and no worse on the others. Each card shows what improves.
More red wines
View all →
NOVA 3 
NOVA 4 
NOVA 3 
