Product 5941875905975

by Olympus 500 ml in Suc Barcode 5941875905975
Good nutritional quality

Product 5941875905975 by Olympus provides 51 kcal per 100 ml, with 12.1 g of sugars and 0.3 g of protein. That is 70% more sugar than the average product in this category. Its Nutri-Score is B. It is listed in the Suc category and comes in a 500 ml pack.

Nutrient levels per 100 ml

Fat
0.1 g · Low
Saturated fat
0 g · Low
Sugars
12.1 g · High
Salt
0 g · Low

Levels use UK front-of-pack reference thresholds for drinks.

Nutrition facts

Nutrient Per 100 ml Category avg
Calories 51 kcal 35 +45%
Total fat 0.1 g 0.3 −63%
Saturated fat 0 g 0.1 −100%
Carbohydrates 12.1 g 7.3 +67%
Total sugars 12.1 g 7.1 +70%
Added sugars 0 g 5.2 −100%
Dietary fiber 0 g 2.4 −100%
Protein 0.3 g 0.5 −40%
Salt 0 g 0 −100%

Category average across 29 Suc products on Foodmetria.

Compared with other suc

Calories higher 25%
Sugars higher 14%
Salt lower 1%
Saturated fat lower 1%
Protein top 41%
Fiber top 100%

Bar shows the share of products in this category that contain less of the nutrient.

Ingredients

Suc de mere 52%, suc de rodie 27,1%, suc de struguri 16,4%, suc de portocale 4,5% Sucurile mai sus mentionate provin din suc concentrat. Produs pasteurizat Tara de origine a fructelor: Grecia. antare

Product details

Quantity
500 ml
Sold in
Romania
Barcode
5941875905975

Prices reported by shoppers

Loading prices…

Recipe & label changes

  1. September 21, 2026
    • Calories: — → 51
    • Fat: — → 0.1
    • Saturated fat: — → 0
    • Sugars: — → 12.1
    • Salt: — → 0
    • Protein: — → 0.3
    • Fiber: — → 0

Changes to this product's label data recorded since Foodmetria started tracking it.

Frequently asked questions

How many calories are in Product 5941875905975?

Product 5941875905975 contains 51 kcal per 100 ml.

How much sugar is in Product 5941875905975?

Product 5941875905975 has 12.1 g of sugars per 100 ml, which is considered high by UK front-of-pack guidelines.

Is Product 5941875905975 healthy?

It has a Nutri-Score of B (A is best, E is worst). Scores describe nutritional quality and processing, not suitability for your individual diet.

Source: Open Food Facts (ODbL). Last updated September 21, 2026. Spotted a mistake? Edit this product on Open Food Facts. Not medical advice — always check the package label.

Reviews

No reviews yet. Tried Product 5941875905975? Be the first to share how it tastes.

Write a review

Your rating

Reviews are moderated. See our Privacy Policy.

Compare & rankings

Healthier alternatives

Best in category →

Same category, meaningfully better on at least one measure and no worse on the others. Each card shows what improves.

More suc

View all →

More from Olympus

View all →