天乃屋の歌舞伎揚 ぷち

by 天乃屋 23 g in 米菓 Barcode 4901035222220
Not enough data to compute
Ultra-processed food

天乃屋の歌舞伎揚 ぷち by 天乃屋 provides 557 kcal per 100 g and 4.4 g of protein. It is classified as NOVA 4 (ultra-processed food). It is listed in the 米菓 category and comes in a 23 g pack. Contains: gluten, soybeans.

Nutrient levels per 100 g

Fat
36.5 g · High
Salt
1.7 g · High

Levels use UK front-of-pack reference thresholds.

Nutrition facts

Serving size: 1 portion (23 g)

Nutrient Per 100 g Per serving% DV* Category avg
Calories 557 kcal 128 kcal 510 +9%
Total fat 36.5 g 8.4 g 11% 25.5 +43%
Added sugars 14.1 g 3.2 g 6% 5.9 +140%
Protein 4.4 g 1 g 2% 7 −38%
Salt 1.7 g 0.4 g 1.5 +17%

*% Daily Value for a serving, based on a 2,000-calorie diet (FDA reference values). Category average across 3 米菓 products on Foodmetria.

Ingredients

うるち米(米国産、国産)、植物油、砂糖、しょうゆ(小麦・大豆を含む)、果糖ぶどう糖液糖、食塩、調味エキス(大豆を含む) 加工でん粉(小麦由来)、調味料(アミノ酸等)、カラメル色素

May contain palm oil
Allergens
GlutenSoybeans
May contain traces
CrustaceansPeanuts

Additives 2

Amino acids

Overexposure risk is based on EFSA evaluations as recorded by Open Food Facts.

Product details

Quantity
23 g
Serving size
1 portion (23 g)
Sold in
United States
Barcode
4901035222220

Prices reported by shoppers

Loading prices…

Frequently asked questions

How many calories are in 天乃屋の歌舞伎揚 ぷち?

天乃屋の歌舞伎揚 ぷち contains 557 kcal per 100 g and about 128 kcal per serving (1 portion (23 g)).

Is 天乃屋の歌舞伎揚 ぷち healthy?

It is in NOVA group 4 — ultra-processed food. Scores describe nutritional quality and processing, not suitability for your individual diet.

What allergens does 天乃屋の歌舞伎揚 ぷち contain?

According to the label data it contains: Gluten, Soybeans. It may also contain traces of crustaceans, peanuts. Recipes change — always check the package label.

Source: Open Food Facts (ODbL). Last updated February 23, 2026. Spotted a mistake? Edit this product on Open Food Facts. Not medical advice — always check the package label.

Reviews

No reviews yet. Tried 天乃屋の歌舞伎揚 ぷち? Be the first to share how it tastes.

Write a review

Your rating

Reviews are moderated. See our Privacy Policy.

Healthier alternatives

Best in category →

Same category, meaningfully better on at least one measure and no worse on the others. Each card shows what improves.

More 米菓

View all →