1925 double concentré; de tomates (tomatenmark)
1925 double concentré; de tomates (tomatenmark) by Petti provides 91 kcal per 100 g, with 14.5 g of sugars and 4.8 g of protein. That is 118% more sugar than the average product in this category. Its Nutri-Score is C and it is classified as NOVA 3 (processed food). It is listed in the Tomatoes and their products category.
Nutrient levels per 100 g
Levels use UK front-of-pack reference thresholds.
Nutrition facts
| Nutrient | Per 100 g | Category avg |
|---|---|---|
| Calories | 91 kcal | 62 +46% |
| Total fat | 1 g | 2.2 −54% |
| Saturated fat | 0.2 g | 0.4 −64% |
| Carbohydrates | 14.5 g | 8.1 +80% |
| Total sugars | 14.5 g | 6.6 +118% |
| Added sugars | 0 g | 2.3 −100% |
| Dietary fiber | 2.3 g | 1.7 +37% |
| Protein | 4.8 g | 1.8 +160% |
| Salt | 1.5 g | 0.7 +111% |
*% Daily Value for 100 g, based on a 2,000-calorie diet (FDA reference values). Category average across 520 Tomatoes and their products products on Foodmetria.
Compared with other tomatoes and their products
Bar shows the share of products in this category that contain less of the nutrient.
Ingredients
tomates (99%), sel.
Product details
- Sold in
- France
- Barcode
- 8003496001409
Prices reported by shoppers
Loading prices…
Frequently asked questions
How many calories are in 1925 double concentré; de tomates (tomatenmark)?
1925 double concentré; de tomates (tomatenmark) contains 91 kcal per 100 g.
How much sugar is in 1925 double concentré; de tomates (tomatenmark)?
1925 double concentré; de tomates (tomatenmark) has 14.5 g of sugars per 100 g, which is considered moderate by UK front-of-pack guidelines.
Is 1925 double concentré; de tomates (tomatenmark) healthy?
It has a Nutri-Score of C (A is best, E is worst); it is in NOVA group 3 — processed food. Scores describe nutritional quality and processing, not suitability for your individual diet.
Is 1925 double concentré; de tomates (tomatenmark) vegan?
Based on its ingredient list, it appears to be vegan. Always check the package label.
Source: Open Food Facts (ODbL). Last updated March 24, 2026. Spotted a mistake? Edit this product on Open Food Facts. Not medical advice — always check the package label.
Reviews
Compare & rankings
Healthier alternatives
Best in category →Same category, meaningfully better on at least one measure and no worse on the others. Each card shows what improves.
a NOVA 1 
a NOVA 1 
a NOVA 1 
a NOVA 1 More tomatoes and their products
View all →
a NOVA 1
a NOVA 1 
NOVA 4 
b 
b NOVA 3 
c More from Petti
View all →
b NOVA 3 
c NOVA 3 
a 
a NOVA 3 
c NOVA 3 
c