Yoyos vs Damak karamel krokan
Overall, Yoyos has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 6 of our comparison points versus 1.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Yoyos | Damak karamel krokan |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | c | e |
| NOVA group | 3 | — |
| Calories | 280 kcal | 560 kcal |
| Fat | 0.2 g | 35 g |
| Saturated fat | 0 g | 18 g |
| Sugars | 42 g | 46 g |
| Salt | 0 g | 0.1 g |
| Fiber | 10 g | 1.1 g |
| Protein | 1.9 g | 10 g |
| Additives | 0 | 2 |
| Allergens | None listed | Milk, Nuts |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Yoyos has 50% fewer calories (280 kcal vs 560 kcal).
- Yoyos has 99% less fat (0.2 g vs 35 g).
- Yoyos has no saturated fat, while Damak karamel krokan has 18 g.
- Yoyos has 89% more fiber (10 g vs 1.1 g).
- Damak karamel krokan has 81% more protein (10 g vs 1.9 g).
- Yoyos has the better Nutri-Score.
- Only Damak karamel krokan lists: Milk, Nuts.
Ingredients
Yoyos
Pommes (65,8%), poires (32,9%), fraises (1,0%), extrait de carotte noire (0,3%)
Damak karamel krokan
EN Caramelized White Chocolate with Pistachio and Crispy Caramel Croquant: Caramelized white chocolate [sugar, whole milk powder, cocoa butter, caramelized sugar (sugar, maltodextrin), whey powder (milk product), emulsifier (sunflower lecithin), salt, flavourings], pistachio (17%), buttered caramel croquant crumbles (7%) [sugar, glucose syrup, milk cream, butter (milk product), raising agent (sodium bicarbonate), salt, natural flavouring]. [May contain: Wheat, other nuts and peanut]
FAQ
Which is healthier: Yoyos or Damak karamel krokan?
Overall, Yoyos has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Yoyos has fewer calories: 280 kcal versus 560 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Yoyos has less sugar: 42 g versus 46 g per 100 g.