Yaourts en gourde abricot et fraise x 6 vs Linea 0%0%
Overall, Linea 0%0% has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 6 of our comparison points versus 1.
Yaourts en gourde abricot et fraise x 6
Linea 0%0%
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Yaourts en gourde abricot et... | Linea 0%0% |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | e | b |
| NOVA group | 4 | — |
| Calories | 93 kcal | 32 kcal |
| Fat | 2.3 g | 0.1 g |
| Saturated fat | 1.6 g | 0.1 g |
| Sugars | 13 g | 3.8 g |
| Salt | 0.1 g | 0.1 g |
| Fiber | 0.5 g | — |
| Protein | 3.7 g | 3 g |
| Additives | 1 | 0 |
| Allergens | Milk | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Linea 0%0% has 65% fewer calories (32 kcal vs 93 kcal).
- Linea 0%0% has 96% less fat (0.1 g vs 2.3 g).
- Linea 0%0% has 94% less saturated fat (0.1 g vs 1.6 g).
- Linea 0%0% has 71% less sugar (3.8 g vs 13 g).
- Yaourts en gourde abricot et fraise x 6 has 19% more protein (3.7 g vs 3 g).
- Linea 0%0% has the better Nutri-Score.
- Only Yaourts en gourde abricot et fraise x 6 lists: Milk.
Ingredients
Yaourts en gourde abricot et fraise x 6
Lait écrémé (origine : France) 70%, sucre 8,2% (teneur moyenne), crème (origine : France) 7,2%, purée de fruits reconstituée 6% (abricot ou fraise), lait écrémé en poudre (origine : France), amidon de maïs, stabilisant : pectines, arômes naturels, jus de citron concentré, ferments lactiques, vitamine D.
Linea 0%0%
Depois de de abrir. Embalado em atmosfera protetora. Isento de glúten. LADL
FAQ
Which is healthier: Yaourts en gourde abricot et fraise x 6 or Linea 0%0%?
Overall, Linea 0%0% has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Linea 0%0% has fewer calories: 32 kcal versus 93 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Linea 0%0% has less sugar: 3.8 g versus 13 g per 100 g.