Yaourt sur lit à la châtaigne vs Skyr lit aux marrons
Overall, Skyr lit aux marrons has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 8 of our comparison points versus 0.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Yaourt sur lit à la châtaign... | Skyr lit aux marrons |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | c | a |
| NOVA group | — | 4 |
| Calories | 112 kcal | 81 kcal |
| Fat | 3.8 g | 0.5 g |
| Saturated fat | 2.2 g | 0.1 g |
| Sugars | 12.9 g | 9.8 g |
| Salt | 0.1 g | 0.1 g |
| Fiber | 0.5 g | 1.2 g |
| Protein | 3.3 g | 7.9 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | Milk, Nuts |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Skyr lit aux marrons has 28% fewer calories (81 kcal vs 112 kcal).
- Skyr lit aux marrons has 87% less fat (0.5 g vs 3.8 g).
- Skyr lit aux marrons has 96% less saturated fat (0.1 g vs 2.2 g).
- Skyr lit aux marrons has 24% less sugar (9.8 g vs 12.9 g).
- Skyr lit aux marrons has 59% more fiber (1.2 g vs 0.5 g).
- Skyr lit aux marrons has 58% more protein (7.9 g vs 3.3 g).
- Skyr lit aux marrons has the better Nutri-Score.
- Only Skyr lit aux marrons lists: Milk, Nuts.
Ingredients
Yaourt sur lit à la châtaigne
Not available.
Skyr lit aux marrons
Yaourt maigre (Lait)- Eau - Sucre 6.4% - Marrons 3.8% - Amidon de maïs - Jus de citron à base de concentré - Marrons glacés 0.1% (Marrons - Sucre - Sirop de glucose - Extrait de vanille)- Arôme naturel - Sirop de glucose - Extrait de vanille. Lait d'origine France.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Yaourt sur lit à la châtaigne or Skyr lit aux marrons?
Overall, Skyr lit aux marrons has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Skyr lit aux marrons has fewer calories: 81 kcal versus 112 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Skyr lit aux marrons has less sugar: 9.8 g versus 12.9 g per 100 g.