Wrigley’s Extra White Bubblemint vs Protex senza zucchero
Overall, Wrigley’s Extra White Bubblemint has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 3 of our comparison points versus 0.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Wrigley’s Extra White Bubble... | Protex senza zucchero |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | b | c |
| NOVA group | — | 4 |
| Calories | 240 kcal | 340 kcal |
| Fat | 0 g | 0 g |
| Saturated fat | 0 g | 0 g |
| Sugars | 0 g | 0 g |
| Salt | 0.1 g | 0 g |
| Protein | 0 g | 0 g |
| Additives | 0 | 11 |
| Allergens | None listed | Soybeans |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Wrigley’s Extra White Bubblemint has 29% fewer calories (240 kcal vs 340 kcal).
- Wrigley’s Extra White Bubblemint has the better Nutri-Score.
- Only Protex senza zucchero lists: Soybeans.
Ingredients
Wrigley’s Extra White Bubblemint
Not available.
Protex senza zucchero
Edulcoranti (xilitolo (30%), sorbitolo, mannitolo, sciroppo di maltitolo, aspartame), gomma base fosfato dicalcico, maltodestrina, stabilizzante (glicerolo), aromi, amido, emulsionanti (esteri di saccarosio degli addi grassi, lecitine di SOIA), addensanti (gomma arabica, gomma di cellulosa), olio di cocco, monofluorofosfato di sodio, antiossidante (E321), agente di rivestimento (cera carnauba). Contiene una fonte di fenilalanina.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Wrigley’s Extra White Bubblemint or Protex senza zucchero?
Overall, Wrigley’s Extra White Bubblemint has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Wrigley’s Extra White Bubblemint has fewer calories: 240 kcal versus 340 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Wrigley’s Extra White Bubblemint has less sugar: 0 g versus 0 g per 100 g.