Comparison

Ice Cream Flavored Bubble Gum vs Protex senza zucchero

Overall, Protex senza zucchero has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 3 of our comparison points versus 0.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientIce Cream Flavored Bubble Gu...Protex senza zucchero
Nutri-Score e c
NOVA group 4 4
Calories 357 kcal 340 kcal
Fat 0 g 0 g
Saturated fat 0 g 0 g
Sugars 71.4 g 0 g
Salt 0 g 0 g
Fiber 0 g —
Protein 0 g 0 g
Additives711
AllergensNone listedSoybeans

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Protex senza zucchero has no sugar, while Ice Cream Flavored Bubble Gum has 71.4 g.
  • Protex senza zucchero has the better Nutri-Score.
  • Only Protex senza zucchero lists: Soybeans.

Ingredients

Ice Cream Flavored Bubble Gum

sugar, dextrose, corn syrup, gum base, natural and artificial flavors, glycerin, resinous glaze, tapioca starch, carnauba wax, colors (yellow 5 lake, yellow 5 & 6, red 40 lake, red 40, blue 1 lake, blue 1, titanium dioxide, bht.

Protex senza zucchero

Edulcoranti (xilitolo (30%), sorbitolo, mannitolo, sciroppo di maltitolo, aspartame), gomma base fosfato dicalcico, maltodestrina, stabilizzante (glicerolo), aromi, amido, emulsionanti (esteri di saccarosio degli addi grassi, lecitine di SOIA), addensanti (gomma arabica, gomma di cellulosa), olio di cocco, monofluorofosfato di sodio, antiossidante (E321), agente di rivestimento (cera carnauba). Contiene una fonte di fenilalanina.

FAQ

Which is healthier: Ice Cream Flavored Bubble Gum or Protex senza zucchero?

Overall, Protex senza zucchero has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Protex senza zucchero has fewer calories: 340 kcal versus 357 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Protex senza zucchero has less sugar: 0 g versus 71.4 g per 100 g.

More comparisons