Comparison

Wiśnia nowosądecka w czekoladzie vs Amarene al cioccolato

Overall, Wiśnia nowosądecka w czekoladzie has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 1 of our comparison points versus 0.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientWiśnia nowosądecka w czekola...Amarene al cioccolato
Nutri-Score e e
NOVA group 4 —
Calories 429 kcal 416 kcal
Fat 17 g 16.6 g
Saturated fat 11 g 10 g
Sugars 62 g 62 g
Salt 0 g 0.1 g
Fiber 0.8 g —
Protein 3.6 g 3.1 g
Additives40
AllergensSoybeansNone listed

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Wiśnia nowosądecka w czekoladzie has 14% more protein (3.6 g vs 3.1 g).
  • Only Wiśnia nowosądecka w czekoladzie lists: Soybeans.

Ingredients

Wiśnia nowosądecka w czekoladzie

Czekolada (59,5%) [cukier, miazga kakaowa, tłuszcz kakaowy, emulgator (lecytyny (z _soi_)), polirycynooleinian poliglicerolu, aromat], wiśnia kandyzowana (40%) [cukier, wiśnia, mąka ryżowa, regulator kwasowości (kwas cytrynowy), naturalny aromat wiśniowy z innymi naturalnymi aromatami), cukier, syrop glukozowy, substancja glazurująca (guma arabska).

Amarene al cioccolato

Not available.

FAQ

Which is healthier: Wiśnia nowosądecka w czekoladzie or Amarene al cioccolato?

Overall, Wiśnia nowosądecka w czekoladzie has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Amarene al cioccolato has fewer calories: 416 kcal versus 429 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Wiśnia nowosądecka w czekoladzie has less sugar: 62 g versus 62 g per 100 g.

More comparisons