Wings party mexicain vs Coq'ailes barbecue
Overall, Coq'ailes barbecue has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 4 of our comparison points versus 1.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Wings party mexicain | Coq'ailes barbecue |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | c | a |
| NOVA group | 4 | 4 |
| Calories | 201 kcal | 210 kcal |
| Fat | 13 g | 12 g |
| Saturated fat | 3.4 g | 3.2 g |
| Sugars | 1.1 g | 2.2 g |
| Salt | 1.2 g | 0 g |
| Fiber | — | 0.1 g |
| Protein | 18 g | 22 g |
| Additives | 1 | 1 |
| Allergens | None listed | Gluten, Soybeans |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Wings party mexicain has 50% less sugar (1.1 g vs 2.2 g).
- Coq'ailes barbecue has no salt, while Wings party mexicain has 1.2 g.
- Coq'ailes barbecue has 18% more protein (22 g vs 18 g).
- Coq'ailes barbecue has the better Nutri-Score.
- Only Coq'ailes barbecue lists: Gluten, Soybeans.
Ingredients
Wings party mexicain
Manchons de poulet , ailerons de poulet (origine : France), sel, amidon transformé de manioc, épices (dont piment), sucre, plantes aromatiques, tomates, poivrons, maltodextrine, arômes naturels, huile de tournesol.
Coq'ailes barbecue
Manchons de poulet, sucre, protéines de soja, sel (dont sel fumé), amidon de blé, poudre de tomate, arômes naturels, ail ,oignon, extrait de levure, épices et extrait d'épices (dont paprika fumé), dextrose, extrait de malt (contient gluten), maltodextrine, huile essentielle d'ail, colorant : extrait de paprika.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Wings party mexicain or Coq'ailes barbecue?
Overall, Coq'ailes barbecue has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Wings party mexicain has fewer calories: 201 kcal versus 210 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Wings party mexicain has less sugar: 1.1 g versus 2.2 g per 100 g.