Comparison

Coq'ailes barbecue vs Alitas Barbacoa

Overall, Coq'ailes barbecue has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 4 of our comparison points versus 2.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientCoq'ailes barbecueAlitas Barbacoa
Nutri-Score a b
NOVA group 4 4
Calories 210 kcal 177 kcal
Fat 12 g 11.2 g
Saturated fat 3.2 g 3.3 g
Sugars 2.2 g 1.5 g
Salt 0 g 0.7 g
Fiber 0.1 g —
Protein 22 g 16.2 g
Additives14
AllergensGluten, SoybeansNone listed

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Alitas Barbacoa has 16% fewer calories (177 kcal vs 210 kcal).
  • Alitas Barbacoa has 32% less sugar (1.5 g vs 2.2 g).
  • Coq'ailes barbecue has no salt, while Alitas Barbacoa has 0.7 g.
  • Coq'ailes barbecue has 26% more protein (22 g vs 16.2 g).
  • Coq'ailes barbecue has the better Nutri-Score.
  • Only Coq'ailes barbecue lists: Gluten, Soybeans.

Ingredients

Coq'ailes barbecue

Manchons de poulet, sucre, protéines de soja, sel (dont sel fumé), amidon de blé, poudre de tomate, arômes naturels, ail ,oignon, extrait de levure, épices et extrait d'épices (dont paprika fumé), dextrose, extrait de malt (contient gluten), maltodextrine, huile essentielle d'ail, colorant : extrait de paprika.

Alitas Barbacoa

Alitas de pollo (87%), agua, azúcar, especias, plantas aromáticas, sal, maltodextrina, cebolla, ajo, tomate en polvo, aromas, aroma de humo, fibras vegetales, almidón, estabilizante (E-500ii), acidulante (E-262ii) y aceite de girasol.

FAQ

Which is healthier: Coq'ailes barbecue or Alitas Barbacoa?

Overall, Coq'ailes barbecue has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Alitas Barbacoa has fewer calories: 177 kcal versus 210 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Alitas Barbacoa has less sugar: 1.5 g versus 2.2 g per 100 g.

More comparisons