Wildschweinsalami Salame con cinghiale vs Salam Banatean
Overall, Wildschweinsalami Salame con cinghiale has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 2 of our comparison points versus 0.
Wildschweinsalami Salame con cinghiale
Salam Banatean
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Wildschweinsalami Salame con... | Salam Banatean |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | e | e |
| NOVA group | — | 4 |
| Calories | 376 kcal | 414 kcal |
| Fat | 28.9 g | 34.5 g |
| Saturated fat | 10.6 g | 11.4 g |
| Sugars | 0 g | 0.5 g |
| Salt | 4 g | 3.6 g |
| Fiber | — | 0 g |
| Protein | 26.7 g | 25.4 g |
| Additives | 0 | 2 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Wildschweinsalami Salame con cinghiale has 16% less fat (28.9 g vs 34.5 g).
- Wildschweinsalami Salame con cinghiale has no sugar, while Salam Banatean has 0.5 g.
Ingredients
Wildschweinsalami Salame con cinghiale
Not available.
Salam Banatean
Carne de porc, slǎnină, carne de vită, sare, condimente, antioxidant: acid ascorbic; extract de condimente, cultură starter, conservant: nitrit de sodiu. Poate conţine urme de muştar, lactoză, ouă şi produse derivate.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Wildschweinsalami Salame con cinghiale or Salam Banatean?
Overall, Wildschweinsalami Salame con cinghiale has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Wildschweinsalami Salame con cinghiale has fewer calories: 376 kcal versus 414 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Wildschweinsalami Salame con cinghiale has less sugar: 0 g versus 0.5 g per 100 g.