Comparison

Whey isolate zero vs Batido Dinamic Protein de Plátano sabor Cacahuete

Overall, Batido Dinamic Protein de Plátano sabor Cacahuete has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 3 of our comparison points versus 2.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientWhey isolate zeroBatido Dinamic Protein de Pl...
Nutri-Score — —
NOVA group — 4
Calories 352 kcal 49 kcal
Fat 1.2 g 0.2 g
Saturated fat 0.4 g 0.1 g
Sugars 1.6 g 3.5 g
Salt 0.4 g 0.2 g
Protein 84 g 7.6 g
Additives08
AllergensNone listedMilk

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Batido Dinamic Protein de Plátano sabor Cacahuete has 86% fewer calories (49 kcal vs 352 kcal).
  • Batido Dinamic Protein de Plátano sabor Cacahuete has 83% less fat (0.2 g vs 1.2 g).
  • Batido Dinamic Protein de Plátano sabor Cacahuete has 75% less saturated fat (0.1 g vs 0.4 g).
  • Whey isolate zero has 54% less sugar (1.6 g vs 3.5 g).
  • Whey isolate zero has 91% more protein (84 g vs 7.6 g).
  • Only Batido Dinamic Protein de Plátano sabor Cacahuete lists: Milk.

Ingredients

Whey isolate zero

Not available.

Batido Dinamic Protein de Plátano sabor Cacahuete

Agua, leche desnatada, proteínas de la leche (6,9%), Plátano en polvo (1,5%), almidón, estabilizantes:(E-460,E-466, E-452i), fosfato de magnesio, vitaminas: (D,B6,B9,B12), aromas, colorante:(E-100) y edulcorante: (sucralosa).

FAQ

Which is healthier: Whey isolate zero or Batido Dinamic Protein de Plátano sabor Cacahuete?

Overall, Batido Dinamic Protein de Plátano sabor Cacahuete has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Batido Dinamic Protein de Plátano sabor Cacahuete has fewer calories: 49 kcal versus 352 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Whey isolate zero has less sugar: 1.6 g versus 3.5 g per 100 g.

More comparisons