Weiße Schokolade mit Mandelstücken vs Milka Copaya
Overall, Weiße Schokolade mit Mandelstücken has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 4 of our comparison points versus 2.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Weiße Schokolade mit Mandels... | Milka Copaya |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | e | e |
| NOVA group | 3 | 4 |
| Calories | 600 kcal | 546 kcal |
| Fat | 42 g | 32 g |
| Saturated fat | 21 g | 18 g |
| Sugars | 43 g | 58 g |
| Salt | 0.2 g | 0.2 g |
| Fiber | 1.8 g | 1.5 g |
| Protein | 10 g | 5.5 g |
| Additives | 0 | 2 |
| Allergens | Milk, Nuts | Milk, Nuts, Soybeans |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Milka Copaya has 24% less fat (32 g vs 42 g).
- Milka Copaya has 14% less saturated fat (18 g vs 21 g).
- Weiße Schokolade mit Mandelstücken has 26% less sugar (43 g vs 58 g).
- Weiße Schokolade mit Mandelstücken has 17% more fiber (1.8 g vs 1.5 g).
- Weiße Schokolade mit Mandelstücken has 45% more protein (10 g vs 5.5 g).
- Weiße Schokolade mit Mandelstücken is less processed (lower NOVA group).
- Only Milka Copaya lists: Soybeans.
Ingredients
Weiße Schokolade mit Mandelstücken
Bio Rohrohrzucker, 25% Bio Kakaobutter, 23% Bio Vollmilchpulver, 16% Bio Mandelstücke, Bio Vanilleextrakt.
Milka Copaya
Sucre, beurre de cacao, lait écrémé en poudre, lactosérum en poudre (de lait), morceaux d'amandes (7%), flocons de noix de coco (5%), beurre concentré, émulsifiant (lécithines de soja), arôme.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Weiße Schokolade mit Mandelstücken or Milka Copaya?
Overall, Weiße Schokolade mit Mandelstücken has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Milka Copaya has fewer calories: 546 kcal versus 600 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Weiße Schokolade mit Mandelstücken has less sugar: 43 g versus 58 g per 100 g.