Comparison

Wasser; Staatl.Faching. Still vs NaturRadler

Overall, Wasser; Staatl.Faching. Still has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 2 of our comparison points versus 0.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientWasser; Staatl.Faching. Stil...NaturRadler
Nutri-Score a —
NOVA group — 4
Calories 0 kcal 35 kcal
Fat 0 g 0 g
Saturated fat 0 g 0 g
Sugars 0 g 4.4 g
Salt 0.1 g 0 g
Fiber 0 g —
Protein 0 g 0 g
Additives02
AllergensNone listedGluten

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Wasser; Staatl.Faching. Still has no calories, while NaturRadler has 35 kcal.
  • Wasser; Staatl.Faching. Still has no sugar, while NaturRadler has 4.4 g.
  • Only NaturRadler lists: Gluten.

Ingredients

Wasser; Staatl.Faching. Still

Heilwasser zum Trinken

NaturRadler

Erfrischungsgetränk mit Citrusgeschmack (Wasser, Fruktosesirup, Zitronensaft aus Zitronensaftkonzentrat (2,4 %), Orangensaft aus Orangen - saftkonzentrat, Apfelsaft aus Apfelsaftkonzentrat, Kohlensäure, konzentrierter Zitronenextrakt, Säuerungsmittel Citronensäure, natürliches Aroma, Stabilisator Johannisbrotkernmehl, Zitronengrasextrakt), Vollbier (Wasser, GERSTENmalz, Hopfen, Hopfenextrakt).

FAQ

Which is healthier: Wasser; Staatl.Faching. Still or NaturRadler?

Overall, Wasser; Staatl.Faching. Still has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Wasser; Staatl.Faching. Still has fewer calories: 0 kcal versus 35 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Wasser; Staatl.Faching. Still has less sugar: 0 g versus 4.4 g per 100 g.

More comparisons