Wasser; Staatl.Faching. Still vs Classic Choco
Overall, Wasser; Staatl.Faching. Still has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 6 of our comparison points versus 2.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Wasser; Staatl.Faching. Stil... | Classic Choco |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | a | d |
| NOVA group | — | — |
| Calories | 0 kcal | 100 kcal |
| Fat | 0 g | 4.3 g |
| Saturated fat | 0 g | 1.2 g |
| Sugars | 0 g | 4.3 g |
| Salt | 0.1 g | 0.2 g |
| Fiber | 0 g | 1.5 g |
| Protein | 0 g | 6.5 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | Milk |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Wasser; Staatl.Faching. Still has no calories, while Classic Choco has 100 kcal.
- Wasser; Staatl.Faching. Still has no fat, while Classic Choco has 4.3 g.
- Wasser; Staatl.Faching. Still has no saturated fat, while Classic Choco has 1.2 g.
- Wasser; Staatl.Faching. Still has no sugar, while Classic Choco has 4.3 g.
- Classic Choco has 100% more fiber (1.5 g vs 0 g).
- Classic Choco has 100% more protein (6.5 g vs 0 g).
- Wasser; Staatl.Faching. Still has the better Nutri-Score.
- Only Classic Choco lists: Milk.
Ingredients
Wasser; Staatl.Faching. Still
Heilwasser zum Trinken
Classic Choco
Hrote E
FAQ
Which is healthier: Wasser; Staatl.Faching. Still or Classic Choco?
Overall, Wasser; Staatl.Faching. Still has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Wasser; Staatl.Faching. Still has fewer calories: 0 kcal versus 100 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Wasser; Staatl.Faching. Still has less sugar: 0 g versus 4.3 g per 100 g.