Vinaigre de vin aromatisé à la framboise vs Vinho Planalto Branco Reserva CX 2 Uni+copo
Neither product is clearly better overall — it depends on what matters most to you.
Vinaigre de vin aromatisé à la framboise
Vinho Planalto Branco Reserva CX 2 Uni+copo
Nutrition per 100 ml
| Nutrient | Vinaigre de vin aromatisé à... | Vinho Planalto Branco Reserv... |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | — | — |
| NOVA group | 4 | 2 |
| Calories | 10 kcal | 1 kcal |
| Fat | 0.1 g | 1 g |
| Saturated fat | 0.1 g | 1 g |
| Sugars | 0.1 g | 0 g |
| Salt | 0.1 g | 0 g |
| Fiber | 0.1 g | — |
| Protein | 0.1 g | 0 g |
| Additives | 2 | 1 |
| Allergens | Sulphur dioxide and sulphites | Sulphur dioxide and sulphites |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Vinho Planalto Branco Reserva CX 2 Uni+copo has 90% fewer calories (1 kcal vs 10 kcal).
- Vinaigre de vin aromatisé à la framboise has 90% less fat (0.1 g vs 1 g).
- Vinaigre de vin aromatisé à la framboise has 90% less saturated fat (0.1 g vs 1 g).
- Vinho Planalto Branco Reserva CX 2 Uni+copo is less processed (lower NOVA group).
Ingredients
Vinaigre de vin aromatisé à la framboise
Vinaigre de vin rouge (dont sulfites), arôme naturel, arôme naturel de framboise 0,4 %, conservateur : disulfite de potassium, stabilisant : gomme arabique.
Vinho Planalto Branco Reserva CX 2 Uni+copo
Vinagre de vinho branco, água, conservante (dióxido de enxofre). Contém Sulfitos
FAQ
Which is healthier: Vinaigre de vin aromatisé à la framboise or Vinho Planalto Branco Reserva CX 2 Uni+copo?
Neither product is clearly better overall — it depends on what matters most to you. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Vinho Planalto Branco Reserva CX 2 Uni+copo has fewer calories: 1 kcal versus 10 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Vinho Planalto Branco Reserva CX 2 Uni+copo has less sugar: 0 g versus 0.1 g per 100 g.