Vinaigre balsamique de Modène IGP bio vs Vinaigre balsamique de Modène
Overall, Vinaigre balsamique de Modène has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 4 of our comparison points versus 1.
Vinaigre balsamique de Modène IGP bio
Vinaigre balsamique de Modène
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Vinaigre balsamique de Modèn... | Vinaigre balsamique de Modèn... |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | — | — |
| NOVA group | 2 | 2 |
| Calories | 138 kcal | 96 kcal |
| Fat | 0 g | 0.5 g |
| Saturated fat | 0 g | 0.1 g |
| Sugars | 29 g | 18 g |
| Salt | 0.1 g | 0.1 g |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0.5 g |
| Protein | 0.7 g | 1.1 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | Sulphur dioxide and sulphites | Sulphur dioxide and sulphites |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Vinaigre balsamique de Modène has 30% fewer calories (96 kcal vs 138 kcal).
- Vinaigre balsamique de Modène IGP bio has no fat, while Vinaigre balsamique de Modène has 0.5 g.
- Vinaigre balsamique de Modène has 38% less sugar (18 g vs 29 g).
- Vinaigre balsamique de Modène has 100% more fiber (0.5 g vs 0 g).
- Vinaigre balsamique de Modène has 36% more protein (1.1 g vs 0.7 g).
Ingredients
Vinaigre balsamique de Modène IGP bio
Vinaigre de vin*, moût de raisin cuit*. *Produits issus de l'Agriculture Biologique.
Vinaigre balsamique de Modène
Vinaigre de vin (contient des sulfites), concentré de moût de raisin (contient des sulfites).
FAQ
Which is healthier: Vinaigre balsamique de Modène IGP bio or Vinaigre balsamique de Modène?
Overall, Vinaigre balsamique de Modène has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Vinaigre balsamique de Modène has fewer calories: 96 kcal versus 138 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Vinaigre balsamique de Modène has less sugar: 18 g versus 29 g per 100 g.