Comparison

Creme mit Aceto Balsamico di Modena IGP - Himbeere vs Vinaigre balsamique de Modène

Overall, Vinaigre balsamique de Modène has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 4 of our comparison points versus 0.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientCreme mit Aceto Balsamico di...Vinaigre balsamique de Modèn...
Nutri-Score — —
NOVA group 4 2
Calories 203 kcal 96 kcal
Fat 0.5 g 0.5 g
Saturated fat 0.1 g 0.1 g
Sugars 33 g 18 g
Salt 0 g 0.1 g
Fiber 0.5 g 0.5 g
Protein 0.8 g 1.1 g
Additives10
AllergensNone listedSulphur dioxide and sulphites

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Vinaigre balsamique de Modène has 53% fewer calories (96 kcal vs 203 kcal).
  • Vinaigre balsamique de Modène has 45% less sugar (18 g vs 33 g).
  • Vinaigre balsamique de Modène has 27% more protein (1.1 g vs 0.8 g).
  • Vinaigre balsamique de Modène is less processed (lower NOVA group).
  • Only Vinaigre balsamique de Modène lists: Sulphur dioxide and sulphites.

Ingredients

Creme mit Aceto Balsamico di Modena IGP - Himbeere

„Aceto Balsamico di Modena I.G.P." 60% (Weinessig (enthält Sulfite), konzentrierter Traubenmost), gekochter Traubenmost, Glukosesirup, Himbeersaft 6% (aus konzentriertem Saft), modifizierte Stärke, natürliches Aroma.

Vinaigre balsamique de Modène

Vinaigre de vin (contient des sulfites), concentré de moût de raisin (contient des sulfites).

FAQ

Which is healthier: Creme mit Aceto Balsamico di Modena IGP - Himbeere or Vinaigre balsamique de Modène?

Overall, Vinaigre balsamique de Modène has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Vinaigre balsamique de Modène has fewer calories: 96 kcal versus 203 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Vinaigre balsamique de Modène has less sugar: 18 g versus 33 g per 100 g.

More comparisons