Vin mousseux brut blanc de blancs 75 cl Charles Volner vs Vin mousseux rosé désalcoolisé
Overall, Vin mousseux rosé désalcoolisé has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 3 of our comparison points versus 1.
Vin mousseux brut blanc de blancs 75 cl Charles Volner
Vin mousseux rosé désalcoolisé
Nutrition per 100 ml
| Nutrient | Vin mousseux brut blanc de b... | Vin mousseux rosé désalcooli... |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | — | — |
| NOVA group | 3 | — |
| Calories | 31 kcal | 23 kcal |
| Fat | 2.4 g | 0 g |
| Saturated fat | 0.6 g | 0 g |
| Sugars | 0.7 g | 5 g |
| Salt | 0 g | 0 g |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g |
| Protein | 0.1 g | 0 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Vin mousseux rosé désalcoolisé has 26% fewer calories (23 kcal vs 31 kcal).
- Vin mousseux rosé désalcoolisé has no fat, while Vin mousseux brut blanc de blancs 75 cl Charles Volner has 2.4 g.
- Vin mousseux rosé désalcoolisé has no saturated fat, while Vin mousseux brut blanc de blancs 75 cl Charles Volner has 0.6 g.
- Vin mousseux brut blanc de blancs 75 cl Charles Volner has 87% less sugar (0.7 g vs 5 g).
Ingredients
Vin mousseux brut blanc de blancs 75 cl Charles Volner
Vin Mousseux
Vin mousseux rosé désalcoolisé
Not available.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Vin mousseux brut blanc de blancs 75 cl Charles Volner or Vin mousseux rosé désalcoolisé?
Overall, Vin mousseux rosé désalcoolisé has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Vin mousseux rosé désalcoolisé has fewer calories: 23 kcal versus 31 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Vin mousseux brut blanc de blancs 75 cl Charles Volner has less sugar: 0.7 g versus 5 g per 100 g.