Comparison

Terre Australe vs Vin mousseux brut blanc de blancs 75 cl Charles Volner

Overall, Terre Australe has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 3 of our comparison points versus 1.

Nutrition per 100 ml

NutrientTerre AustraleVin mousseux brut blanc de b...
Nutri-Score — —
NOVA group 3 3
Calories 0 kcal 31 kcal
Fat 0 g 2.4 g
Saturated fat — 0.6 g
Sugars 0 g 0.7 g
Salt 26.7 g 0 g
Fiber 0 g 0 g
Protein 0 g 0.1 g
Additives00
AllergensSulphur dioxide and sulphitesNone listed

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Terre Australe has no calories, while Vin mousseux brut blanc de blancs 75 cl Charles Volner has 31 kcal.
  • Terre Australe has no fat, while Vin mousseux brut blanc de blancs 75 cl Charles Volner has 2.4 g.
  • Terre Australe has no sugar, while Vin mousseux brut blanc de blancs 75 cl Charles Volner has 0.7 g.
  • Vin mousseux brut blanc de blancs 75 cl Charles Volner has no salt, while Terre Australe has 26.7 g.
  • Only Terre Australe lists: Sulphur dioxide and sulphites.

Ingredients

Terre Australe

Vin mousseux. Contient des _sulfites_.

Vin mousseux brut blanc de blancs 75 cl Charles Volner

Vin Mousseux

FAQ

Which is healthier: Terre Australe or Vin mousseux brut blanc de blancs 75 cl Charles Volner?

Overall, Terre Australe has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Terre Australe has fewer calories: 0 kcal versus 31 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Terre Australe has less sugar: 0 g versus 0.7 g per 100 g.

More comparisons