Terre Australe vs Vin mousseux brut blanc de blancs 75 cl Charles Volner
Overall, Terre Australe has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 3 of our comparison points versus 1.
Terre Australe
Vin mousseux brut blanc de blancs 75 cl Charles Volner
Nutrition per 100 ml
| Nutrient | Terre Australe | Vin mousseux brut blanc de b... |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | — | — |
| NOVA group | 3 | 3 |
| Calories | 0 kcal | 31 kcal |
| Fat | 0 g | 2.4 g |
| Saturated fat | — | 0.6 g |
| Sugars | 0 g | 0.7 g |
| Salt | 26.7 g | 0 g |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g |
| Protein | 0 g | 0.1 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | Sulphur dioxide and sulphites | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Terre Australe has no calories, while Vin mousseux brut blanc de blancs 75 cl Charles Volner has 31 kcal.
- Terre Australe has no fat, while Vin mousseux brut blanc de blancs 75 cl Charles Volner has 2.4 g.
- Terre Australe has no sugar, while Vin mousseux brut blanc de blancs 75 cl Charles Volner has 0.7 g.
- Vin mousseux brut blanc de blancs 75 cl Charles Volner has no salt, while Terre Australe has 26.7 g.
- Only Terre Australe lists: Sulphur dioxide and sulphites.
Ingredients
Terre Australe
Vin mousseux. Contient des _sulfites_.
Vin mousseux brut blanc de blancs 75 cl Charles Volner
Vin Mousseux
FAQ
Which is healthier: Terre Australe or Vin mousseux brut blanc de blancs 75 cl Charles Volner?
Overall, Terre Australe has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Terre Australe has fewer calories: 0 kcal versus 31 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Terre Australe has less sugar: 0 g versus 0.7 g per 100 g.