Comparison

Véritable jambon persillé Bourgogne vs Jambon persillé de Bourgogne

Overall, Jambon persillé de Bourgogne has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 1 of our comparison points versus 0.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientVéritable jambon persillé Bo...Jambon persillé de Bourgogne
Nutri-Score d d
NOVA group 4 4
Calories 126 kcal 122 kcal
Fat 4.8 g 4.3 g
Saturated fat 1.8 g 1.6 g
Sugars 0.5 g 0.5 g
Salt 2 g 2.2 g
Protein 20.2 g 20.3 g
Additives44
AllergensGelatin, Milk, Pork, Sulphur dioxide and sulphitesMilk, Sulphur dioxide and sulphites

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Jambon persillé de Bourgogne has 10% less fat (4.3 g vs 4.8 g).
  • Only Véritable jambon persillé Bourgogne lists: Gelatin, Pork.

Ingredients

Véritable jambon persillé Bourgogne

38% pork ham, pork, broth (water, rinds), white wine of which 2% burgundy aligoté (sulphites) 3,3%, parsley, vinegar, salt, gelatin, garlic, shallots, spices, dextrose, lactose, gelling agent: carrageenan, antioxidant: sodium ascorbate, preservative: sodium nitrite,

Jambon persillé de Bourgogne

Viande de porc (dont 51% de jambon , épaule 49%) bouillon (eau, couenne), vin blanc dont Bourgogne Aligoté 2% (sulfites), persil 3.3%, vinaigre, sel, gélatine, ail, échalote, épices, dextrose, lactose, gélifiant : carraghénanes ; antioxydant : ascorbate de sodium ; conservateur : nitrite de sodium.

FAQ

Which is healthier: Véritable jambon persillé Bourgogne or Jambon persillé de Bourgogne?

Overall, Jambon persillé de Bourgogne has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Jambon persillé de Bourgogne has fewer calories: 122 kcal versus 126 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Véritable jambon persillé Bourgogne has less sugar: 0.5 g versus 0.5 g per 100 g.

More comparisons