Comparison

Velluto au vinaigre balsamique vs Douceur au vinaigre balsamique de modène

Overall, Velluto au vinaigre balsamique has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 4 of our comparison points versus 2.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientVelluto au vinaigre balsamiq...Douceur au vinaigre balsamiq...
Nutri-Score c d
NOVA group 4 3
Calories 162 kcal 237 kcal
Fat 0 g 0 g
Saturated fat 0 g —
Sugars 33 g 47 g
Salt 0.1 g 0.1 g
Fiber 0.5 g —
Protein 0.7 g 1.5 g
Additives10
AllergensSulphur dioxide and sulphitesSulphur dioxide and sulphites

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Velluto au vinaigre balsamique has 32% fewer calories (162 kcal vs 237 kcal).
  • Velluto au vinaigre balsamique has 30% less sugar (33 g vs 47 g).
  • Douceur au vinaigre balsamique de modène has 53% more protein (1.5 g vs 0.7 g).
  • Velluto au vinaigre balsamique has the better Nutri-Score.
  • Douceur au vinaigre balsamique de modène is less processed (lower NOVA group).

Ingredients

Velluto au vinaigre balsamique

Vinaigre balsamique de Modène 469% (vinaigre de vin (sulfites), moût de raisin cuit (sulfites)), vinaigre de vin (sulfites), eau, amidon de maïs modifié, épaississant : gomme xanthane.

Douceur au vinaigre balsamique de modène

Moût de raisin cuit*, Vinaigre Balsamique de Modène® 35% (vinaigre de vin*, moût de raisin cuit*), amidon de maïs. (*) contient des SULFITES.

FAQ

Which is healthier: Velluto au vinaigre balsamique or Douceur au vinaigre balsamique de modène?

Overall, Velluto au vinaigre balsamique has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Velluto au vinaigre balsamique has fewer calories: 162 kcal versus 237 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Velluto au vinaigre balsamique has less sugar: 33 g versus 47 g per 100 g.

More comparisons