Comparison

Douceur à base de vinaigre balsamique de Modène IGP vs Velluto au vinaigre balsamique

Overall, Velluto au vinaigre balsamique has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 3 of our comparison points versus 1.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientDouceur à base de vinaigre b...Velluto au vinaigre balsamiq...
Nutri-Score — c
NOVA group 4 4
Calories 215 kcal 162 kcal
Fat 0 g 0 g
Saturated fat 0 g 0 g
Sugars 42 g 33 g
Salt 0 g 0.1 g
Fiber 0 g 0.5 g
Protein 1 g 0.7 g
Additives01
AllergensSulphur dioxide and sulphitesSulphur dioxide and sulphites

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Velluto au vinaigre balsamique has 25% fewer calories (162 kcal vs 215 kcal).
  • Velluto au vinaigre balsamique has 21% less sugar (33 g vs 42 g).
  • Velluto au vinaigre balsamique has 100% more fiber (0.5 g vs 0 g).
  • Douceur à base de vinaigre balsamique de Modène IGP has 30% more protein (1 g vs 0.7 g).

Ingredients

Douceur à base de vinaigre balsamique de Modène IGP

Moût de raisin cuit 61%, aceto balsamico di modena IGP 35% (vinaigre de vin, moût de raisin concentré), amidon de maïs, fibres végétales. Contient des SULFITES.

Velluto au vinaigre balsamique

Vinaigre balsamique de Modène 469% (vinaigre de vin (sulfites), moût de raisin cuit (sulfites)), vinaigre de vin (sulfites), eau, amidon de maïs modifié, épaississant : gomme xanthane.

FAQ

Which is healthier: Douceur à base de vinaigre balsamique de Modène IGP or Velluto au vinaigre balsamique?

Overall, Velluto au vinaigre balsamique has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Velluto au vinaigre balsamique has fewer calories: 162 kcal versus 215 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Velluto au vinaigre balsamique has less sugar: 33 g versus 42 g per 100 g.

More comparisons