Vegan Hazelnut Chocolate vs CÔTE D'OR Bloc puur hazelnoot
Overall, CÔTE D'OR Bloc puur hazelnoot has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 2 of our comparison points versus 1.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Vegan Hazelnut Chocolate | CÔTE D'OR Bloc puur hazelnoo... |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | — | e |
| NOVA group | — | 4 |
| Calories | 563 kcal | 569 kcal |
| Fat | 37 g | 39 g |
| Saturated fat | 16 g | 16 g |
| Sugars | 45 g | 40 g |
| Salt | — | 0 g |
| Fiber | 3.7 g | 7.8 g |
| Protein | 8.2 g | 7.3 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | Milk, Nuts, Soybeans | Milk, Nuts, Soybeans |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- CÔTE D'OR Bloc puur hazelnoot has 11% less sugar (40 g vs 45 g).
- CÔTE D'OR Bloc puur hazelnoot has 53% more fiber (7.8 g vs 3.7 g).
- Vegan Hazelnut Chocolate has 11% more protein (8.2 g vs 7.3 g).
Ingredients
Vegan Hazelnut Chocolate
Sugar, whole HAZELNUTS (20%), coco cocoa mass, skimmed MILK powder, whey powder (from MILK), MILK fat, emulsifier (SOYA lecithins), H paste, flavouring. Cocoa solids: 33 % minimum in the Alpine milk chocolate. Milk solids: 18 % minimu Alpine milk chocolate. MAY CONTAIN OTHER NUTS AND WHEAT. Road, Uxbridge, UB8 1DH. 47g 7,4g 3% Eiwitten/Protein Sal/Sale/Zout/Salt
CÔTE D'OR Bloc puur hazelnoot
Suiker, cacaomassa, HAZELNOTEN (24%), cacaoboter, MELKVET, emulgator (SOJALECITHINEN), natuurlijk vanillearoma, magere MELKPOEDER.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Vegan Hazelnut Chocolate or CÔTE D'OR Bloc puur hazelnoot?
Overall, CÔTE D'OR Bloc puur hazelnoot has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Vegan Hazelnut Chocolate has fewer calories: 563 kcal versus 569 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
CÔTE D'OR Bloc puur hazelnoot has less sugar: 40 g versus 45 g per 100 g.