Twix Fingers vs Sustitutivo de comida chocolate negro
Overall, Sustitutivo de comida chocolate negro has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 5 of our comparison points versus 1.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Twix Fingers | Sustitutivo de comida chocol... |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | e | — |
| NOVA group | 4 | 4 |
| Calories | 493 kcal | 381 kcal |
| Fat | 24 g | 12 g |
| Saturated fat | 14 g | 4.6 g |
| Sugars | 49 g | 33 g |
| Salt | 0.4 g | 0.8 g |
| Fiber | — | 7.6 g |
| Protein | 4.4 g | 26.5 g |
| Additives | 3 | 4 |
| Allergens | Gluten, Milk, Soybeans | Milk, Soybeans |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Sustitutivo de comida chocolate negro has 23% fewer calories (381 kcal vs 493 kcal).
- Sustitutivo de comida chocolate negro has 50% less fat (12 g vs 24 g).
- Sustitutivo de comida chocolate negro has 67% less saturated fat (4.6 g vs 14 g).
- Sustitutivo de comida chocolate negro has 33% less sugar (33 g vs 49 g).
- Twix Fingers has 50% less salt (0.4 g vs 0.8 g).
- Sustitutivo de comida chocolate negro has 83% more protein (26.5 g vs 4.4 g).
- Only Twix Fingers lists: Gluten.
Ingredients
Twix Fingers
Sugar, glucose syrup, wheat flour (17%) paim fat, skimmed milk powde cocoa butter, cocoa mass milk fat. lactose, whey permeate (from milk). fat reduced cocoa, salt. emulsifier (soya lecithin), raising agent (E500 vanilla extract. (May contain: almond. barley hazelnut, oats Suitable for Vegetarians
Sustitutivo de comida chocolate negro
Jarabe de glucosa-fructosa - Chocolate con leche (20%) (azúcar, manteca de cacao, leche en polvo, pasta de cacao, suero de leche en polvo, emulgente: lecitinas (de soja), extracto de vainilla) - Proteínas aisladas de soja (19,8%) - Extruidos de soja (8%) (proteínas aisladas de soja, cacao en polvo alcalinizado, almidón de tapioca) - Complejo de minerales (fibra de acacia, carbonato de magnesio, sales cálcicas de ácido ortofosfórico, citrato de sodio, pirofosfato férico, gluconato de cinc gluconato de manganeso, gluconato cúprico, yoduro de potasio, selenito de sodio) - Agente de carga: polidextrosa - Aceite de girasol-Cacao magro (2,196)-Citrato de potasio-Aromas-Copos de avena (sin gluten) (1,5%) - Copos de maíz (1,5%) (maíz, azúcar, sal) - Emulgente: lecitinas - Complejo de vitaminas (ácido L-ascorbico, maltodextrina, menaquinona, acetato de D-alfa-tocoferilo, nicotinamida, beta-caroteno, D-pantotenato cálcico, clorhidrato de piridoxina, cianocobalamina, colecalciferol, clorhidrato de tiamina, riboflavina, L-metilfolato cálcico, D-biotina) - Acidulante: ácido cítrico. Puede contener trazas de frutos de cáscara, granos de sésamo y cacahuetes.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Twix Fingers or Sustitutivo de comida chocolate negro?
Overall, Sustitutivo de comida chocolate negro has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Sustitutivo de comida chocolate negro has fewer calories: 381 kcal versus 493 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Sustitutivo de comida chocolate negro has less sugar: 33 g versus 49 g per 100 g.