Twinkelz vs Pure chocoladehagelslag
Neither product is clearly better overall — it depends on what matters most to you.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Twinkelz | Pure chocoladehagelslag |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | e | e |
| NOVA group | 4 | 4 |
| Calories | 441 kcal | 442 kcal |
| Fat | 15 g | 15 g |
| Saturated fat | 8.7 g | 8.8 g |
| Sugars | 64.2 g | 65 g |
| Salt | 0 g | 0.3 g |
| Fiber | 7 g | 6.6 g |
| Protein | 5.4 g | 5.4 g |
| Additives | 2 | 1 |
| Allergens | Milk | Milk |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Ingredients
Twinkelz
Suiker, magere cacaopoeder', cacaoboter', emulgator: lecithinen (raapzaad); boterconcentraat (melk), glansmiddel: Arabische gom; vanillearoma.
Pure chocoladehagelslag
Suiker, cacaomassa¹, magere cacaopoeder¹, dextrose, emulgator: raap - zaadlecithine, glansmiddel: arabische gom, volle MELKpoeder
FAQ
Which is healthier: Twinkelz or Pure chocoladehagelslag?
Neither product is clearly better overall — it depends on what matters most to you. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Twinkelz has fewer calories: 441 kcal versus 442 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Twinkelz has less sugar: 64.2 g versus 65 g per 100 g.