Twinkelz vs Chocolade hagelslag puur
Overall, Twinkelz has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 3 of our comparison points versus 0.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Twinkelz | Chocolade hagelslag puur |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | e | e |
| NOVA group | 4 | 4 |
| Calories | 441 kcal | 445 kcal |
| Fat | 15 g | 17 g |
| Saturated fat | 8.7 g | 10 g |
| Sugars | 64.2 g | 65 g |
| Salt | 0 g | 0 g |
| Fiber | 7 g | 6.3 g |
| Protein | 5.4 g | 4.7 g |
| Additives | 2 | 0 |
| Allergens | Milk | Milk, Soybeans |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Twinkelz has 12% less fat (15 g vs 17 g).
- Twinkelz has 13% less saturated fat (8.7 g vs 10 g).
- Twinkelz has 13% more protein (5.4 g vs 4.7 g).
- Only Chocolade hagelslag puur lists: Soybeans.
Ingredients
Twinkelz
Suiker, magere cacaopoeder', cacaoboter', emulgator: lecithinen (raapzaad); boterconcentraat (melk), glansmiddel: Arabische gom; vanillearoma.
Chocolade hagelslag puur
Suiker, magere cacaopoeder*, cacaoboter*, gefractioneerd melkvet (harde fractie), emulgator (sojalecithine), aroma (bevat melk). *Rainforest Alliance gecertificeerd.ra.org.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Twinkelz or Chocolade hagelslag puur?
Overall, Twinkelz has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Twinkelz has fewer calories: 441 kcal versus 445 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Twinkelz has less sugar: 64.2 g versus 65 g per 100 g.