Turron imperial de cacahuete vs Turròn blando de cacahuete
Overall, Turron imperial de cacahuete has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 2 of our comparison points versus 1.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Turron imperial de cacahuete | Turròn blando de cacahuete |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | e | e |
| NOVA group | 4 | 4 |
| Calories | 490 kcal | 520 kcal |
| Fat | 19 g | 28 g |
| Saturated fat | 2.9 g | 4 g |
| Sugars | 61 g | 52 g |
| Salt | 0 g | 0 g |
| Protein | 12 g | 13 g |
| Additives | 0 | 1 |
| Allergens | Eggs, Peanuts | Peanuts |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Turron imperial de cacahuete has 32% less fat (19 g vs 28 g).
- Turron imperial de cacahuete has 28% less saturated fat (2.9 g vs 4 g).
- Turròn blando de cacahuete has 15% less sugar (52 g vs 61 g).
- Only Turron imperial de cacahuete lists: Eggs.
Ingredients
Turron imperial de cacahuete
CACAHUETE (38%), azúcar, jarabe de glucosa y fructosa, clara de HUEVO, oblea* (fécula de patata, aceite de girasol). *oblea como recubrimiento en la superficie. Puede contener trazas de FRUTOS DE ÇASCARA.
Turròn blando de cacahuete
Arachides (51%), sucre et stabilisant (E-471). Contient arachides. Peut contenir des traces de noix, oeuf, lait, soja, gluten et sulfites.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Turron imperial de cacahuete or Turròn blando de cacahuete?
Overall, Turron imperial de cacahuete has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Turron imperial de cacahuete has fewer calories: 490 kcal versus 520 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Turròn blando de cacahuete has less sugar: 52 g versus 61 g per 100 g.