Turrón de Cacahuete Blando vs Turron imperial de cacahuete
Overall, Turron imperial de cacahuete has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 2 of our comparison points versus 1.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Turrón de Cacahuete Blando | Turron imperial de cacahuete |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | e | e |
| NOVA group | — | 4 |
| Calories | 460 kcal | 490 kcal |
| Fat | 21 g | 19 g |
| Saturated fat | 2.9 g | 2.9 g |
| Sugars | 43 g | 61 g |
| Salt | 1.1 g | 0 g |
| Protein | 8.3 g | 12 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | Eggs, Peanuts |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Turrón de Cacahuete Blando has 30% less sugar (43 g vs 61 g).
- Turron imperial de cacahuete has 96% less salt (0 g vs 1.1 g).
- Turron imperial de cacahuete has 31% more protein (12 g vs 8.3 g).
- Only Turron imperial de cacahuete lists: Eggs, Peanuts.
Ingredients
Turrón de Cacahuete Blando
Not available.
Turron imperial de cacahuete
CACAHUETE (38%), azúcar, jarabe de glucosa y fructosa, clara de HUEVO, oblea* (fécula de patata, aceite de girasol). *oblea como recubrimiento en la superficie. Puede contener trazas de FRUTOS DE ÇASCARA.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Turrón de Cacahuete Blando or Turron imperial de cacahuete?
Overall, Turron imperial de cacahuete has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Turrón de Cacahuete Blando has fewer calories: 460 kcal versus 490 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Turrón de Cacahuete Blando has less sugar: 43 g versus 61 g per 100 g.