Comparison

Turrón de cacahuete vs Turron duro de cacahuete

Overall, Turrón de cacahuete has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 6 of our comparison points versus 2.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientTurrón de cacahueteTurron duro de cacahuete
Nutri-Score c e
NOVA group 4 4
Calories 240 kcal 538 kcal
Fat 9 g 20 g
Saturated fat 1.5 g 4 g
Sugars 26 g 39 g
Salt 0 g 0 g
Fiber 1.7 g 2.9 g
Protein 6 g 15 g
Additives01
AllergensEggs, PeanutsEggs, Peanuts

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Turrón de cacahuete has 55% fewer calories (240 kcal vs 538 kcal).
  • Turrón de cacahuete has 55% less fat (9 g vs 20 g).
  • Turrón de cacahuete has 63% less saturated fat (1.5 g vs 4 g).
  • Turrón de cacahuete has 33% less sugar (26 g vs 39 g).
  • Turron duro de cacahuete has 43% more fiber (2.9 g vs 1.7 g).
  • Turron duro de cacahuete has 60% more protein (15 g vs 6 g).
  • Turrón de cacahuete has the better Nutri-Score.

Ingredients

Turrón de cacahuete

Sucre, ARACHIDE (38%), sirop de glucose-fructose, blanc d'OEUF, pain azyme* (amidon de pomm de terre, huile de tournesol). *Pain azyme comme enrobage dan le surface. Peut contenir des traces de FRUITS À COQUE.

Turron duro de cacahuete

Arachides grillées (38% ), sucre, sirop de glucose, miel (2% ), blanc d'oeuf, pain azyme (fécule de pomme de terre et huile de tornesol) et antioxydant E-306 (tocophérol). Peut contenir des traces d'autres noix et sésame

FAQ

Which is healthier: Turrón de cacahuete or Turron duro de cacahuete?

Overall, Turrón de cacahuete has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Turrón de cacahuete has fewer calories: 240 kcal versus 538 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Turrón de cacahuete has less sugar: 26 g versus 39 g per 100 g.

More comparisons