Tuiles goût paprika vs Frit-Sticks ungarisch
Overall, Frit-Sticks ungarisch has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 4 of our comparison points versus 0.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Tuiles goût paprika | Frit-Sticks ungarisch |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | d | d |
| NOVA group | 4 | 4 |
| Calories | 527 kcal | 507 kcal |
| Fat | 30 g | 28 g |
| Saturated fat | 2.9 g | 2.4 g |
| Sugars | 3.2 g | 2.2 g |
| Salt | 1.1 g | 1.3 g |
| Fiber | 2.3 g | 4.8 g |
| Protein | 4 g | 6.5 g |
| Additives | 3 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Frit-Sticks ungarisch has 17% less saturated fat (2.4 g vs 2.9 g).
- Frit-Sticks ungarisch has 31% less sugar (2.2 g vs 3.2 g).
- Frit-Sticks ungarisch has 52% more fiber (4.8 g vs 2.3 g).
- Frit-Sticks ungarisch has 38% more protein (6.5 g vs 4 g).
Ingredients
Tuiles goût paprika
Pomme de terre déshydratée 40 %, huile de tournesol, amidon de pomme de terre, amidon modifié de pomme de terre, sucre, sirop de glucose, sel, oignon en poudre, émulsifiant : E471, piment, ail en poudre, acidifiant : acide citrique, épices (dont paprika 0,02 %), chili en poudre, arôme naturel, extrait de levure, extrait d'épices.
Frit-Sticks ungarisch
Kartoffeln, pflanzliche Öle (Sonnenblume, Raps), Speisesalz, Hefe, Paprikapulver, Zucker, Zwiebelpulver, Hefeextrakt, geräuchertes Paprikapulver, geräuchertes Speisesalz, Knoblauchpulver, Farbstoff (Paprikaextrakt), Aroma.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Tuiles goût paprika or Frit-Sticks ungarisch?
Overall, Frit-Sticks ungarisch has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Frit-Sticks ungarisch has fewer calories: 507 kcal versus 527 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Frit-Sticks ungarisch has less sugar: 2.2 g versus 3.2 g per 100 g.