Comparison

Tuiles aux amandes vs Tuiles Amandes

Overall, Tuiles aux amandes has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 2 of our comparison points versus 1.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientTuiles aux amandesTuiles Amandes
Nutri-Score e e
NOVA group 3 4
Calories 485 kcal 464 kcal
Fat 20 g 17.4 g
Saturated fat 7.7 g 7.6 g
Sugars 37 g 38 g
Salt 0.4 g 0.2 g
Fiber 2.7 g 2.2 g
Protein 7.4 g 7.6 g
Additives12
AllergensEggs, Gluten, Milk, Nuts, SoybeansEggs, Gluten, Milk, Nuts, Soybeans

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Tuiles Amandes has 13% less fat (17.4 g vs 20 g).
  • Tuiles aux amandes has 19% more fiber (2.7 g vs 2.2 g).
  • Tuiles aux amandes is less processed (lower NOVA group).

Ingredients

Tuiles aux amandes

Sucre, farine de _blé_ 31,6%, _lait_ demi-écrémé, graisse de palme, _amandes_ effilées grillées 10%, amidon de _blé_, _œufs_, extrait de malt d'o_rge_, poudre d'_amandes_ 0,6%, sel, poudre à lever : carbonates de sodium. Peut contenir des traces d'autres fruits à coque, de soja et de graines de sésame.

Tuiles Amandes

Sucre ; farine de blé ; amandes effilées 10%; graisses végétales en proportion variable (coprah, palme); huiles végétales en proportion variable (colza, tournesol); poudre de lait écrémé; amidon de blé ; jaune d'œufs en poudre ; enzymes (dont blé); sirop de sucre inverti; œufs entiers en poudre ; sel; arôme ; poudres à lever: E500, E450. Traces d'autres fruits à coque, soja et graines de sésame.

FAQ

Which is healthier: Tuiles aux amandes or Tuiles Amandes?

Overall, Tuiles aux amandes has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Tuiles Amandes has fewer calories: 464 kcal versus 485 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Tuiles aux amandes has less sugar: 37 g versus 38 g per 100 g.

More comparisons