Comparison

Tuiles aux amandes vs Tuiles Amandes

Overall, Tuiles Amandes has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 3 of our comparison points versus 2.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientTuiles aux amandesTuiles Amandes
Nutri-Score e e
NOVA group 3 4
Calories 490 kcal 464 kcal
Fat 21 g 17.4 g
Saturated fat 11 g 7.6 g
Sugars 46 g 38 g
Salt 0.3 g 0.2 g
Fiber 2.1 g 2.2 g
Protein 8.6 g 7.6 g
Additives02
AllergensEggs, Gluten, Milk, NutsEggs, Gluten, Milk, Nuts, Soybeans

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Tuiles Amandes has 17% less fat (17.4 g vs 21 g).
  • Tuiles Amandes has 31% less saturated fat (7.6 g vs 11 g).
  • Tuiles Amandes has 17% less sugar (38 g vs 46 g).
  • Tuiles aux amandes has 12% more protein (8.6 g vs 7.6 g).
  • Tuiles aux amandes is less processed (lower NOVA group).
  • Only Tuiles Amandes lists: Soybeans.

Ingredients

Tuiles aux amandes

Sucre, farine de blé, blancs d'œufs 24%, beurre concentré 13%, amandes 11%, eau, sel. Peut contenir des traces de soja et autres fruits à coque.

Tuiles Amandes

Sucre ; farine de blé ; amandes effilées 10%; graisses végétales en proportion variable (coprah, palme); huiles végétales en proportion variable (colza, tournesol); poudre de lait écrémé; amidon de blé ; jaune d'œufs en poudre ; enzymes (dont blé); sirop de sucre inverti; œufs entiers en poudre ; sel; arôme ; poudres à lever: E500, E450. Traces d'autres fruits à coque, soja et graines de sésame.

FAQ

Which is healthier: Tuiles aux amandes or Tuiles Amandes?

Overall, Tuiles Amandes has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Tuiles Amandes has fewer calories: 464 kcal versus 490 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Tuiles Amandes has less sugar: 38 g versus 46 g per 100 g.

More comparisons