Comparison

Tuiles aux amandes vs Tuiles aux amandes

Overall, Tuiles aux amandes has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 3 of our comparison points versus 2.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientTuiles aux amandesTuiles aux amandes
Nutri-Score e e
NOVA group 4 3
Calories 476 kcal 490 kcal
Fat 18 g 21 g
Saturated fat 5.3 g 11 g
Sugars 41 g 46 g
Salt 0.2 g 0.3 g
Fiber 2.2 g 2.1 g
Protein 7.4 g 8.6 g
Additives00
AllergensEggs, Gluten, Milk, Nuts, Amandes (Amygdalus communis L.)Eggs, Gluten, Milk, Nuts

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Tuiles aux amandes has 14% less fat (18 g vs 21 g).
  • Tuiles aux amandes has 52% less saturated fat (5.3 g vs 11 g).
  • Tuiles aux amandes has 11% less sugar (41 g vs 46 g).
  • Tuiles aux amandes has 14% more protein (8.6 g vs 7.4 g).
  • Tuiles aux amandes is less processed (lower NOVA group).
  • Only Tuiles aux amandes lists: Amandes (Amygdalus communis L.).

Ingredients

Tuiles aux amandes

Sucre, farine de blé 36%, amandes effilées 10%, huile de tournesol oléique, beurre concentré (dont lait), amidon de blé, jaune d'œuf en poudre, poudre d'amandes 1%, lait écrémé en poudre, enzymes (dont blé), oeufs entiers en poudre, sirop de sucre inverti, sel, arôme. Peut contenir autres fruits à coque, soja, graines de sésame et moutarde.

Tuiles aux amandes

Sucre, farine de blé, blancs d'œufs 24%, beurre concentré 13%, amandes 11%, eau, sel. Peut contenir des traces de soja et autres fruits à coque.

FAQ

Which is healthier: Tuiles aux amandes or Tuiles aux amandes?

Overall, Tuiles aux amandes has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Tuiles aux amandes has fewer calories: 476 kcal versus 490 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Tuiles aux amandes has less sugar: 41 g versus 46 g per 100 g.

More comparisons