TUC Original vs Monaco emmenthal
Overall, TUC Original has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 4 of our comparison points versus 2.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | TUC Original | Monaco emmenthal |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | e | e |
| NOVA group | 4 | 4 |
| Calories | 480 kcal | 553 kcal |
| Fat | 19 g | 36 g |
| Saturated fat | 9 g | 18 g |
| Sugars | 7.1 g | 5.6 g |
| Salt | 1.7 g | 2.1 g |
| Fiber | 2.4 g | 2.4 g |
| Protein | 8.3 g | 12 g |
| Additives | 5 | 4 |
| Allergens | Eggs, Gluten | Gluten, Milk, Soybeans |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- TUC Original has 13% fewer calories (480 kcal vs 553 kcal).
- TUC Original has 47% less fat (19 g vs 36 g).
- TUC Original has 50% less saturated fat (9 g vs 18 g).
- Monaco emmenthal has 21% less sugar (5.6 g vs 7.1 g).
- TUC Original has 19% less salt (1.7 g vs 2.1 g).
- Monaco emmenthal has 31% more protein (12 g vs 8.3 g).
- Only TUC Original lists: Eggs.
- Only Monaco emmenthal lists: Milk, Soybeans.
Ingredients
TUC Original
wheat flour, sunflower oil, glucose-fructose syrup, barley malt, ammonium carbonate, sodium carbonate, salt, eggs, flavor, sodium metabisulfite, traces of soy, sesame seeds
Monaco emmenthal
Farine de BLE 56 %, huiles végétales (palme, colza), EMMENTAL râpé séché 17 %, sucre, sel, sirop de glucose-fructose, poudres à lever (carbonates d'ammonium, carbonates de sodium), farine d'ORGE malté, lactosérum en poudre (de LAIT), levure sèche, émulsifiant (lécithines de SOJA).
FAQ
Which is healthier: TUC Original or Monaco emmenthal?
Overall, TUC Original has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
TUC Original has fewer calories: 480 kcal versus 553 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Monaco emmenthal has less sugar: 5.6 g versus 7.1 g per 100 g.