Tropical zero vs Karvan Cévitam Citroen
Overall, Tropical zero has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 2 of our comparison points versus 0.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Tropical zero | Karvan Cévitam Citroen |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | — | d |
| NOVA group | 4 | 4 |
| Calories | 18 kcal | 294 kcal |
| Fat | — | 0.1 g |
| Saturated fat | — | 0 g |
| Sugars | 1.5 g | 72 g |
| Salt | 0 g | 0 g |
| Fiber | — | 0 g |
| Protein | — | 0.2 g |
| Additives | 5 | 3 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Tropical zero has 94% fewer calories (18 kcal vs 294 kcal).
- Tropical zero has 98% less sugar (1.5 g vs 72 g).
Ingredients
Tropical zero
Water, vruchtensap uit concentraat 15.5% sinaasappel 10,7%, mango 2,5%, passievrucht 2,3%), vulstof: polydextrose Voedingszuur: citroenzuur, natuurlijke aroma's, paprika-extract verdikkingsmiddel: xanthaangom, zoetstoffen: sucralose. steviolglycosiden uit Stevia, conserveermiddel: kaliumsorbaat.
Karvan Cévitam Citroen
Sap uit vruchtensapconcentraat 75% (appel, citroen 33%), suiker, voedingszuur (citroenzuur), aroma's, vitaminen, conserveermiddelen (kaliumsorbaat, natriumbenzoaat).
FAQ
Which is healthier: Tropical zero or Karvan Cévitam Citroen?
Overall, Tropical zero has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Tropical zero has fewer calories: 18 kcal versus 294 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Tropical zero has less sugar: 1.5 g versus 72 g per 100 g.